I recently stumbled upon an excellent guide from the Testleaf blog about HAR files, and honestly, it made me realize how much debugging pain I could've avoided if I'd known about this tool earlier in my testing career.
The Problem We All Face
You know that frustrating moment when a test fails, but there's no obvious reason? The UI looks fine. The element is there. The network seems okay. Yet something's broken, and you're left playing detective with zero clues.
I've spent countless hours in this situation—refreshing pages, clearing caches, comparing environments—trying to figure out why something that worked yesterday suddenly doesn't work today.
Enter HAR Files
HAR (HTTP Archive) files are basically a complete record of everything that happens between your browser and the server during a session. Every request, every response, every header, every status code—all captured in a structured format.
Think of it as a black box recorder for web applications. When something crashes, you have the full flight log to analyze.
Why This Changes Everything
After reading through that blog post, I realized HAR files solve specific problems I encounter regularly:
- Invisible API Failures Sometimes a page loads perfectly, but functionality breaks because a background API call failed. HAR files show you exactly which request returned a 500 error, even if the UI doesn't display any error message.
- Performance Mysteries When a page loads slowly, HAR files reveal which resources are bottlenecks. Is it that third-party script? The oversized image? The slow database query? You'll know immediately.
- CORS Nightmares Cross-Origin Resource Sharing issues are notoriously difficult to debug from screenshots alone. HAR files show you the exact headers and why a request was blocked.
- Reproducing Intermittent Issues Those bugs that only happen "sometimes"? HAR files capture the exact network state when they occur, making reproduction much easier. How to Generate One (It's Stupid Simple) In Chrome (works similarly in Firefox/Edge):
Right-click → Inspect → Network tab
Refresh the page to capture requests
Right-click in the Network tab → "Save all as HAR with content"
That's it. You now have a complete network activity log.
Real-World Impact
What struck me most about the Testleaf blog's approach was the emphasis on collaboration. HAR files aren't just for QA—they're a communication tool.
Instead of writing lengthy bug reports trying to describe a network issue, you attach a HAR file. Developers can open it, see exactly what happened, and identify the problem in minutes instead of hours.
This drastically reduces the back-and-forth that typically happens when debugging complex issues.
Common Issues HAR Files Expose
From my experience and what I learned from that guide:
Failed API requests with error details
Missing or 404'd resources (images, scripts, fonts)
Incorrect request payloads
Authentication/token issues
Slow-loading third-party services
Caching problems
Best Practices I'm Adopting
After reading through the comprehensive breakdown on the Testleaf blog, here's what I'm implementing:
Capture HAR files for every critical bug — especially network-related issues. It takes 10 seconds and saves hours later.
Pair HAR files with screenshots — HAR shows what happened behind the scenes, screenshots show what users saw. Together, they tell the complete story.
Share HAR files early — Don't wait until developers ask for more info. If you suspect a network issue, attach the HAR file to your initial bug report.
Use HAR analysis tools — Online viewers like HAR Viewer make the data much more readable than opening the raw JSON file.
The Lesson
I wish I'd known about HAR files years ago. So many debugging sessions would've been shorter. So many "weird issues" would've had clear explanations. So much frustration would've been avoided.
If you're not using HAR files in your debugging workflow yet, start today. It's one of those tools that immediately proves its value the first time you use it.
Your Experience?
Do you already use HAR files in your testing? Any other debugging tools you think are underrated? Drop your thoughts below—always looking to add more tools to my arsenal.
This post was inspired by the excellent HAR files guide on the Testleaf blog. Their detailed breakdown helped me finally understand why this tool is so powerful for QA debugging.
Top comments (0)