The problem with Big Tech AI pricing
Last week, Anthropic dropped Claude Opus 4.7. Incredible model. The HN thread exploded — 1,800+ points, 1,300+ comments. Developers everywhere excited about what they could build.
Then someone asks the question that always comes up:
"How much does it cost?"
And the excitement quietly dims for half the room.
The real price of $20/month
ChatGPT Plus is $20/month. Claude Pro is $20/month. For someone in San Francisco, that's lunch.
For someone in Lagos, it's 3-4 days of salary.
For someone in Karachi, it's a week's worth of groceries.
For someone in Manila, it's their phone bill.
The absolute price is the same everywhere. The real cost is not.
What $20/month actually means by country
| Country | ChatGPT Price | Local Equivalent | Days of Work |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | $20 | $20 | 0.1 days |
| 🇮🇳 India | $20 | Rs1,665 | 1.5 days |
| 🇧🇷 Brazil | $20 | R$104 | 1.2 days |
| 🇲🇽 Mexico | $20 | MX$346 | 1.8 days |
| 🇵🇠Philippines | $20 | ₱1,120 | 2.1 days |
| 🇮🇩 Indonesia | $20 | Rp325,000 | 2.5 days |
| 🇰🇪 Kenya | $20 | KSh2,600 | 3.0 days |
| 🇳🇬 Nigeria | $20 | ₦32,000 | 4.2 days |
Think about that. A Nigerian developer pays the equivalent of 4 days of salary every month just to use AI tools. A developer in San Francisco pays 2-3 hours.
Same product. Same value. Wildly different real cost.
This isn't just about money
AI tools are becoming infrastructure for developers everywhere. Code review. Documentation. Debugging. Learning new frameworks.
When that infrastructure costs 4 days of salary per month in some places and 2 hours in others, you're not offering the same product. You're offering a luxury version and a poverty version of the same tool.
Developers in Lagos and Manila and Karachi are building the same things. They're solving the same problems. They shouldn't have to pay 10-20x more in real terms to access the same tools.
The math behind SimplyLouie
When I built SimplyLouie, the price came first: $2/month. Not as a loss leader or a growth hack. As a commitment.
At $2/month, AI assistance costs:
- Rs165/month in India → simplylouie.com/in/
- R$10/month in Brazil → simplylouie.com/br/
- MX$35/month in Mexico → simplylouie.com/mx/
- ₱112/month in Philippines → simplylouie.com/ph/
- Rp32,000/month in Indonesia → simplylouie.com/id/
- KSh260/month in Kenya → simplylouie.com/ke/
- ₦3,200/month in Nigeria → simplylouie.com/ng/
- GH₵25/month in Ghana → simplylouie.com/gh/
That's a real price. Not a symbolic one.
Developer API included
If you're building things, the API tier gives you direct Claude access:
curl -X POST https://simplylouie.com/api/chat \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"message": "Review this code for bugs", "code": "...your code here..."}'
Build Claude into your apps, your bots, your workflows — without paying $20/month for the privilege.
Docs at simplylouie.com/developers
50% goes to animal rescue
Half of every subscription goes to dog rescue organizations. Because the $2/month model only works if volume works — and volume only works if the mission is real.
The pricing isn't charity. It's a different business model: high volume, low margin, global reach. If 10,000 developers in emerging markets pay $2/month instead of 500 developers in rich countries paying $20/month, the math works out roughly the same. But the impact is very different.
7-day free trial, no commitment. simplylouie.com
What's your take on geographic pricing parity in AI tools? Should companies localize their prices? Or does one global price make more sense?
Top comments (0)