DEV Community

Tanisha
Tanisha

Posted on

I Replaced My Side Project Backend with AI — Here’s What Broke First

If you’ve been on the internet for more than 5 minutes lately, someone has told you:

“Bro, AI can write your entire backend now.”

So obviously, I believed them.

I decided to run a small experiment:
Could I replace most of my side project backend logic with AI-generated code and prompts?

Short answer: yes.
Long answer: oh no.

Let’s talk about what broke first.


🧪 The Setup

Side project:

  • Simple backend (CRUD + auth + notifications)
  • Nothing fancy, just something that worked
  • Stack: REST APIs, database, some business rules that were… let’s say “grown organically”

The plan:

  • Use AI to generate controllers, services, and even some validation logic
  • “Clean it up later” (famous last words)
  • Move fast, break things — preferably not production

🚨 Thing #1 That Broke: Assumptions

AI is amazing at writing code.

AI is terrible at understanding your assumptions.

Example:

  • I said: “Generate an endpoint to send notifications.”
  • AI said: “Sure, I’ll retry failed notifications infinitely.”

Infinitely.

No backoff. No limits. No circuit breaker.
Just pure optimism.

Turns out AI assumes:

  • Network calls always recover
  • External systems are friendly
  • Rate limits are a suggestion

Reality disagrees.


🔐 Thing #2 That Broke: Security (Quietly)

Nothing crashed.
No errors.
No alarms.

Which is exactly why this was scary.

AI happily:

  • Exposed internal IDs
  • Logged sensitive payloads
  • Skipped edge-case auth checks because “it looked redundant”

The code was clean.
The vulnerability was invisible.

Lesson learned:

If you don’t explicitly say “this is security-sensitive”, AI assumes it’s a tutorial.


🧩 Thing #3 That Broke: Business Logic Nuance

This one hurt emotionally.

I asked AI to:

“Validate whether a user is eligible for an action.”

AI:

  • Checked basic conditions
  • Missed why those conditions existed in the first place

Humans encode intent in ugly if-statements.
AI encodes patterns.

That difference matters more than I expected.


🧠 The Surprising Win

Here’s the twist.

AI was incredible at:

  • Boilerplate
  • DTOs
  • Mappers
  • Test case scaffolding
  • Explaining my own code back to me

It didn’t replace me.
It removed the parts of the job I secretly hated.


🧠 What I’d Do Differently Next Time

If you’re tempted to do this (and you should try it once):

✅ Use AI for:

  • Skeletons
  • Repetitive logic
  • Tests
  • Documentation

🚫 Don’t blindly trust it for:

  • Auth
  • Retries
  • Money
  • “This edge case only exists because of a 2021 incident”

Basically:
AI is a brilliant intern. Not your tech lead.


🎯 Final Take

AI didn’t break my backend.

My overconfidence did.

But honestly?
I’ll still use it again tomorrow.

Just with better prompts… and more tests.

Top comments (0)