Most people know that to make projects using TypeScript "strict" in terms of typing, you need to enable the "strict": true option in the tsconfig. ...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
It's quite fascinating. However, noUncheckedIndexedAccess can be a bit restrictive, which is a bit disappointing.
For instance, it raises errors in cases like the following:
Hey @artxe2 !
I think the issue lies more in the
for...of/for...inloop, as it returns a string for akeyvariable. If you typecast it, everything will be fine πThe solution you provided might not resolve the issue.
TS Playground
Oh, I see.
I understand what issue you're talking about. But here again, the problem is not with
noUncheckedIndexedAccess, but with index signatures. If you explicitly annotate all keys, there won't be such an error. Here is the same playground but this explicit keys.In my article, I repeatedly mentioned that the index signature is a bad thing π
Yes, indeed.
If you have been using the strict option in TypeScript, applying additional stricter options may not introduce many new errors.
However, for types like Array or Record, there are clear use cases, and it's not accurate to categorize them as inherently bad.
For instance, I found type casting cumbersome in cases like the code below to eliminate errors.
Agreed!
In general, as always, it depends on the situation π
Wow, hey from kottans nice to see you here :D
Hi @denys_dev βΊοΈ
Nice to see you and I'm so glad you keep learning πͺ
Thank you for the article π
Thank you for not standing still!