If you're already using the OpenAI SDK, the hardest part of reducing AI cost usually isn't the model choice.
It's migration risk.
Most teams don't want to:
- rebuild prompt pipelines,
- change response parsing everywhere,
- fork logic for multiple vendors,
- or explain to customers why latency suddenly got worse.
That's the reason we built XiDao API: a lower-cost, OpenAI-compatible AI API gateway for developers and startups that want to keep their existing workflow while improving margins.
What problem we're solving
A lot of AI products hit the same wall after launch:
- usage grows,
- API bills rise faster than revenue,
- and every infrastructure change feels risky because it touches core product logic.
For small teams, "just migrate providers" sounds easy in theory but becomes expensive in engineering time.
What XiDao API focuses on
XiDao API is designed around a few practical needs:
- OpenAI-compatible access so existing SDK-based apps need minimal code changes
- Lower-cost model access for teams trying to improve gross margin
- Multi-model options including GPT-5, Claude4.6 Opus, DeepSeek V3, and Qwen Max
- Usage visibility with token tracking and request logs
- Asia-optimized routing for teams and users who care about cross-region latency
Who this is useful for
This is mainly for:
- SaaS teams with AI features already in production
- automation builders with high-volume usage
- wrapper products that need margin room
- teams in Asia who want a smoother network path to major frontier models
Migration angle
The biggest adoption lever for us has been compatibility.
If a developer can keep the same mental model, the same client pattern, and most of the same app structure, they're much more willing to test a cheaper path.
That matters more than fancy positioning.
What we're publishing alongside the product
We're also building a content library around practical migration topics, including:
- switching from OpenAI API to a cheaper compatible endpoint,
- reducing AI API cost without a full rewrite,
- evaluating alternatives for multi-model access.
Temporary blog link:
http://blog.xidao.online:10417/
Looking for feedback
I'm especially interested in hearing from:
- founders managing AI inference costs,
- devs who have already built on OpenAI-compatible APIs,
- teams comparing direct provider access vs gateway layers.
What matters more to you right now:
- lower cost,
- lower migration risk,
- better regional performance,
- multi-model flexibility?
Product: https://global.xidao.online/
Top comments (0)