When migrating a JavaScript project to TypeScript, the challenges usually fall into technical, organizational, and process-related buckets. Here’s how I’d structure an answer:
🔥 Key Challenges & How to Approach Them
1. Codebase Size & Incremental Migration
- Challenge: Converting a large JS codebase all at once is risky and unrealistic.
-
Approach:
- Start small with incremental migration.
- Rename
.js
→.ts
or.tsx
gradually. - Use
allowJs
andcheckJs
intsconfig.json
to support hybrid JS + TS code. - Prioritize core modules (like API clients, business logic) first before UI-heavy code.
2. Lack of Type Information
- Challenge: JavaScript code has no types, so TypeScript can’t infer much.
-
Approach:
- Use
any
as a temporary escape hatch, but plan to replace it. - Add JSDoc comments in legacy JS files for gradual type checking.
- Replace dynamic patterns with clear interfaces or types.
- Use
3. Third-Party Libraries Without Types
- Challenge: Many JS libraries don’t ship TypeScript definitions.
-
Approach:
- Use
@types/*
packages from DefinitelyTyped (npm install @types/lodash
). - If missing, write custom
.d.ts
declaration files. - For quick progress: use
declare module "library-name";
as a placeholder.
- Use
4. Dealing With this
and Context
-
Challenge: JS code often abuses
this
, which TypeScript makes stricter. -
Approach:
- Refactor to arrow functions or properly bind context.
- Define explicit types for
this
where necessary.
5. Dynamic and Loosely-Typed Patterns
- Challenge: JavaScript often uses duck typing, dynamic objects, or monkey patching.
-
Approach:
- Replace with interfaces and union types.
- Use type guards or
unknown
instead ofany
. - For dynamic JSON, start with
Record<string, unknown>
and refine types later.
6. Build & Tooling Updates
- Challenge: Build pipeline needs to support TypeScript.
-
Approach:
- Add
tsc
for type-checking. - Update bundlers (Webpack, Vite, or Rollup) to handle
.ts/.tsx
. - Set up eslint + typescript-eslint for linting.
- Add
7. Cultural & Team Adoption
-
Challenge: Team members may resist TypeScript or misuse
any
. -
Approach:
- Educate with guidelines & code reviews.
- Start with looser compiler options (
"strict": false
) and tighten gradually. - Encourage pairing and refactoring sessions to introduce best practices.
🛠️ Migration Strategy (Step-by-Step)
- Set up TypeScript config
-
tsconfig.json
withallowJs: true
,checkJs: true
.
- Enable gradual checks
- Start with non-strict mode.
- Slowly enable
"strict"
,"noImplicitAny"
,"strictNullChecks"
.
- Rename critical files first
- Convert business logic modules →
.ts
. - Add interfaces for APIs & models.
- Handle external libraries
- Install
@types/*
. - Write
.d.ts
for missing ones.
- Refactor dynamically typed code
- Introduce
unknown
, type guards, enums.
- Iterate & enforce via CI/CD
- Run
tsc --noEmit
in pipelines for type checking. - Add ESLint rules to prevent
any
.
✅ Example Real-World Migration
Suppose you have a legacy JS API client:
// apiClient.js
export function fetchUser(id) {
return fetch(`/api/user/${id}`)
.then(res => res.json());
}
Migrated to TypeScript incrementally:
// apiClient.ts
interface User {
id: number;
name: string;
email: string;
}
export async function fetchUser(id: number): Promise<User> {
const res = await fetch(`/api/user/${id}`);
return res.json() as Promise<User>;
}
Now consumers of fetchUser
get autocompletion, type safety, and error checking.
🎯 Final Thoughts
Migrating JS → TS is less about a “big bang” and more about gradual adoption:
- Start small → Convert file by file.
-
Leverage tooling → JSDoc,
allowJs
, declaration files. -
Enforce culture → Strict mode over time, reduce
any
. - Payoff → Better maintainability, fewer bugs, stronger contracts.
More Details
Check out the full code of this article on All About Typescript.
Get all articles related to system design:
Hashtag: #SystemDesignWithZeeshanAli
GitHub Repository: SystemDesignWithZeeshanAli
Top comments (0)