So now we have an ignoratio elenchi, a petitio principii, and an ad hominem. That's a lot of fallacies to squeeze into one comment, bravo! Let's take them in order shall we?
ignoratio elenchi - whether or not feminists are tolerant to Islam is not something the articles discusses. You're diverting the argument
petitio principii - I'm intolerant because you say I'm intolerant. Right…
ad hominem - refusing to watch propaganda with links to right-wing fascist media does not make me close-minded
// , “It is not so important to be serious as it is to be serious about the important things. The monkey wears an expression of seriousness... but the monkey is serious because he itches."(No/No)
So now we have an ignoratio elenchi, a petitio principii, and an ad hominem. That's a lot of fallacies to squeeze into one comment, bravo! Let's take them in order shall we?
I'd say the modern version of the "woke" resembles more Marcuse than Popper, although both of them seem to advocate for superficially similar ideas.