A test strategy isn't about waterfall or agile, V-model or DevOps. Whatever your lifecycle religion, you still need one. Because without a strategy, testing is just busywork in search of a purpose.
The moment someone in a meeting asks, "Can you show us the test strategy?", you can feel the panic ripple through the room like static electricity ⚡. Laptops open, folders shuffle, and someone mutters: "We had a slide deck once … I think it's in Confluence."
That's not a strategy. That's theater.
When asked for the strategy, panic sets in. (Gemini generated image)
🎭 The Illusion of the Test Strategy
Most so-called strategies aren't strategies at all. They're compliance costumes 🎭: written to tick a process box, not to guide real testing.
It doesn't matter if the project is agile, waterfall, or some Franken-model in between 🧟♂️ - a test strategy is always needed. Why? Because it's the only artifact that defines the perimeter: what's in scope, what's out, and how testing connects to the rest of the system.
Without that perimeter, teams drift. Requirements slide through unnoticed. Testers end up covering what's convenient instead of what's critical.
A strategy isn't about copying ISTQB or ISO clauses into a PDF. That's plagiarism, not planning.
Strategy as compliance costume: looks good, does little. (Gemini generated image)
💀 Why Most Strategies Suck
The truth? Most test strategies fail not because people are incompetent, but because the system incentivizes theater over truth.
Here's how:
- Static documents in a dynamic world 🌍. Projects move fast; strategies don't. By the time your PDF gets approved, it's already obsolete.
- PowerPoint career theater 🎬. Some strategies are written to look good on slides, not to be used by testers. They're performance art for managers.
- Ghostwritten fiction 👻. Too often, consultants draft strategies for products they've never touched. The result is generic cut-and-paste doctrine, useless when you actually need to decide whether a specific requirement is in scope.
A real strategy is not a frozen relic. It's a living map. Without it, you're basically navigating a skyscraper with a floorplan that only shows the lobby.
🧠 The Human Factor
Here's the part glossy decks always ignore: a strategy is a social contract, not a spreadsheet.
It's not about the artifact - it's about what it enables:
- Testers get the mandate to act early and decisively.
- Developers know where testing begins and ends, avoiding the endless "Is this my problem or yours?" debates.
- Managers see clarity instead of chaos.
Think of it like the lines on a soccer field ⚽: without them, you don't know what counts as a goal, a foul, or even out of bounds. With them, the game can be played.
Without a perimeter, the game can't even begin. (Gemini generated image)
📋 What a Good Strategy Should Do
A strategy that doesn't suck should:
- Evolve as a living playbook 📖, not a sacred text.
- Provide crystal clarity 🔍 on scope and perimeter, usable by every team member.
- Drive decisions ⚖️ on priority, depth, and rigor of testing.
- Enable testers organizationally and technically 🛠️ so they can actually execute.
A good strategy isn't an ornament for audits. It's the scaffolding 🏗️ the team climbs to deliver quality.
🔄 The Antidote to Strategy Theater
A bad test strategy isn't just another illusion - it's the puppet master pulling the strings behind all the others: the coverage selfies, the rubber-stamp reviews, the shift-wrong mentality.
The antidote is simple, but not easy:
- Keep it clear.
- Keep it alive.
- Keep it used.
Because if your strategy isn't guiding day-to-day decisions, it's not a strategy - it's corporate poetry.
And nobody ships products with sonnets.
Strategies that suck protect careers. Strategies that work protect products. (Gemini generated image)
🎬 Closing Punchline
Static strategies keep projects busy.
Living strategies keep projects alive.
If your "strategy" is just another forgotten PDF, you're not protecting quality - you're protecting careers.
And that's not a strategy. That's a recipe for failure.
🔖 If you found this perspective helpful, follow me for more insights on software quality, testing strategies, and ASPICE in practice.
© 2025 Abdul Osman. All rights reserved. You are welcome to share the link to this article on social media or other platforms. However, reproducing the full text or republishing it elsewhere without permission is prohibited.
Top comments (0)