The Illusions of Quality—Episode 8: 📏 Measuring What Actually Matters: Quality Metrics That Don’t Lie 🤥

The metrics were perfect. 100% requirements coverage. Zero critical bugs. The quality dashboard looked like a Greenpeace protest. The manager got promoted. The product got recalled.

The system worked perfectly—for advancing careers. 🎯

🌃 The Streetlight Problem

If you judged a city's safety only by counting how many streetlights were installed, you'd be misled.
The real question is: are people actually safer walking home at night?

In software, we make the same mistake. We count "streetlights" — test cases, coverage percentages, bug counts — and convince ourselves we're measuring safety. But these numbers don't tell us if the product is reliable, usable, secure, or fit for purpose.

Counting streetlights ≠ ensuring safety. Same with software metrics. (Gemini generated image)

🤳 Flashback: The Selfie

Back in episode 5, we called coverage metrics the "selfie of software quality". Selfies can be flattering, but they're carefully staged and cropped. Coverage percentages, bug counts, pass/fail dashboards — all give us the same illusion of control.

The deeper problem:

• Teams measure what's easy. 😅
• Managers accept what looks scientific. 🔬

The result? Dashboards full of green numbers that don't actually help anyone decide what to do next.

🚨 Reality Check

Leaders don't need vanity numbers designed to make them feel safe. They need uncomfortable signals that actually keep them safe. Signals that answer:

• Are we fit for purpose? 🎯
• Where are we exposed to risk? ⚡
• What's the consequence of ignoring this gap? 💸

Vanity metrics don't answer these. For example:

• 95% test coverage looks great. 🎉
• But what if the missing 5% contains your safety-critical braking function? 🚗💥

👉 Activity is not assurance. What matters is fitness, risk, and consequence. ⚖️

🏷️ Nutrition Label

We don't have to invent this from scratch. The compass already exists: ISO/IEC 25010 (as highlighted in our coverage metrics article).

Think of it as a nutrition label for software. Counting calories (coverage%) tells you almost nothing. The nutrition label shows the full profile — protein, sugar, vitamins, allergens. Likewise, ISO 25010 forces us to look at reliability, usability, maintainability, security, performance, and more.

ISO 25010 is the nutrition label for software quality. (Gemini generated image)

Three Rules for Meaningful Metrics:

1. ⚖️ Anchor in Reality: Measure ISO 25010 attributes, not vanity KPIs.
2. 🔗 Connect to Consequence: Show business impact (cost, risk, trust), not just activity.
3. 🗣 Translate for Decisions: Report in the language of leadership, not in the jargon of QA.

💄 Signals, Not Cosmetics

Here's how to replace dashboard cosmetics with decision signals. Let's break the illusion.

Instead of counting Test Cases …

• The Illusion: High count = rigorous testing.
• The Reality: It measures activity, not criticality.
• ✅ Measure This: Risk-Based Coverage
• ❓ Ask: "Do we have coverage for 80% of the high-risk user journeys? The remaining 20% represents a €X potential rework cost." 💰

Instead of chasing Code Coverage % …

• The Illusion: High percentage = few bugs.
• The Reality: It's a selfie; it hides what's missing.
• ✅ Measure This: Critical-Path Coverage & Defect Density
• ❓ Ask: "Is the code for the emergency stop function covered? What is the defect density in our most complex module?" 🚨

Instead of tracking Bug Count …

• The Illusion: More bugs = worse quality.
• The Reality: It punishes transparency and ignores severity.
• ✅ Measure This: Escaped Defects & Cost of Rework
• ❓ Ask: "How many critical bugs escaped to production last release? What was the total cost (in time and money) of fixing them?" 💸

Instead of celebrating Pass/Fail Ratio …

• The Illusion: Green dashboard = project health.
• The Reality: It creates a false sense of security.
• ✅ Measure This: Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) & Defect Leakage
• ❓ Ask: "When a test fails, how long does it take to fix it? How many bugs did testing miss that were found by the customer?" ⏱️

💡 Vanity metrics decorate slides. Meaningful metrics guide strategy.

Dashboards should guide decisions, not decorate slides. (Gemini generated image)

🛑 The Veto

Managers — before you approve another dashboard, run every metric through this filter:

If the answer is "no" to any, veto it. ❌

1. 🧭 Decision: Does this number help me decide what to do?
2. 👤 Customer: Does it reflect what the customer will actually feel?
3. ⚠️ Risk: Does it show risk reduction, not just activity?

Here's the ultimate acid test for any metric. Ask:

• If this number moves, does anyone change their mind? 🤔
• If this number looks good, can the product still fail in the field? 🏭
• If this number disappears, would the team actually miss it? 🎯

If the answers are "no, yes, no", you're staring at vanity metrics. 📊

Vanity metrics deserve a veto. (Gemini generated image)

🌉 Bridge to What's Next

Real metrics are more than numbers. They're signals of risk, cost, and trust ⚡💰🤝. They give managers levers for decisions, not just cosmetic dashboards.

But numbers alone don't shift culture. Someone has to craft them into arguments that persuade executives, guide investment, and anchor change. 💼
That's where we're headed next: 🔜

• "The Toolsmith, Not the Tool: A Tester's Role in Modern DevOps": why testers must stop being tool operators and start acting as toolsmiths — enablers of meaningful measurement.
• "The Art of the Quality Argument: How to Persuade Managers to Invest in Quality": how to turn these metrics into arguments that win executive support.

Because measuring what matters is just the start. Making it matter to decision-makers is where quality culture is born. 🌱

🔖 If you found this perspective helpful, follow me for more insights on software quality, testing strategies, and ASPICE in practice.

© 2025 Abdul Osman. All rights reserved. You are welcome to share the link to this article on social media or other platforms. However, reproducing the full text or republishing it elsewhere without permission is prohibited.