August 18, 2025
OK so this comparison is probably gonna sound weird to most people because like... why would you even compare these two? 😅
But here's the thing - I've spent the last year building payment solutions on both NEAR and XRP Ledger (don't ask why, clients have interesting requirements), and they turned out to be way more different than I expected. Like, completely different philosophies about what blockchain should even DO.
This isn't your typical "which chain is better" post because honestly? They're not even competing for the same use cases. It's more like comparing a Swiss Army knife to a really, really good hammer. Both useful, but for totally different jobs.
How I Ended Up Here (The Accidental Journey)
Started out as a regular web developer making boring payment systems for e-commerce sites. Then crypto winter ended, clients started asking for blockchain payment integrations, and suddenly I'm learning about consensus mechanisms at 2 AM 🌙
Picked NEAR first because the developer experience looked approachable. Picked up XRP Ledger because a fintech client needed fast, cheap cross-border payments and kept hearing about how banks actually use it.
Turned out to be one of the most educational experiences I've had in years.
First Impressions: Startup vs Corporate Vibes
NEAR: "Let's Build the Future Together" ✨
NEAR felt like joining a startup where everyone's excited about possibilities. The onboarding experience was surprisingly smooth - no fighting with weird config files or hunting for RPC endpoints. Just install the CLI and you're basically ready to go.
The whole platform screams "we want developers to succeed here." Human-readable addresses, predictable costs, JavaScript support for smart contracts. It felt designed by people who remember what it's like to be confused by blockchain development.
Building my first payment app on NEAR was actually fun. The cross-contract calls made sense, the testing framework worked reliably, and users loved the experience of sending money to alice.near instead of 0x1234abcd...
XRP Ledger: "We've Been Doing This Since 2012" 🏦
XRP Ledger felt like walking into a bank's IT department. Everything is incredibly well-organized, thoroughly documented, and designed for one specific thing: moving money really, really efficiently.
The development experience is... different. There's no "deploy your own smart contract" step like other blockchains. Instead, you're working with built-in features that have been battle-tested for over a decade.
At first I was like "where are the smart contracts?" But then I realized - for payment applications, you often don't NEED custom smart contracts. The ledger's built-in features handle most payment scenarios better than anything I could code myself.
The Great Smart Contract Debate 🤔
This is where things get interesting...
NEAR: "Code Whatever You Want"
NEAR gives you full programmability. Want to build a voting system? Write a contract. Need a custom token? Write a contract. Building the next social media platform? Go nuts.
The flexibility is incredible. I built everything from simple escrow systems to complex multi-sig wallets to social features that interact with other contracts. The JavaScript support meant my team could contribute without learning a completely new language.
But here's the thing - with great power comes great responsibility. Every bug is YOUR bug. Every security flaw is YOUR security flaw. The flexibility is amazing until something goes wrong and you realize you're responsible for handling edge cases that the platform developers never thought of.
XRP Ledger: "We Already Built the Good Stuff"
XRP Ledger took the opposite approach. Instead of letting developers write arbitrary code, they built really powerful primitives for financial applications and said "use these."
Want to create tokens? There's a built-in system for that. Need escrow? Built-in feature. Multi-signing? Yep, built-in. Decentralized exchange? Already there.
At first this felt limiting. But then I started using these features and realized... they're actually really well designed. The escrow system handles edge cases I never would have thought of. The DEX has features that would take me months to implement properly.
Plot twist: XRP Ledger announced smart contract support in 2025 with their EVM sidechain, but honestly? Most of what I needed was already built into the ledger itself.
Performance Reality Check ⚡
NEAR: Solid and Predictable
NEAR handles everything I throw at it pretty consistently:
- Transaction finality: 1-2 seconds every time
- Costs: Usually 0.001-0.01 NEAR per transaction (like $0.002-0.02)
- Throughput: Never hit any limits with my apps
- Reliability: 99%+ uptime in my experience
The sharding is mostly invisible to developers, which is great. You don't need to think about which shard your contract lives on most of the time.
XRP Ledger: Built for Scale
XRP Ledger is honestly impressive from a performance standpoint:
- Transaction finality: 3-5 seconds consistently
- Costs: ~0.00001 XRP per transaction (literally fractions of a penny)
- Throughput: 1,500+ TPS (way more than I'll ever need)
- Reliability: Rock solid, been running since 2012
The consensus mechanism is different from other blockchains - no mining, no staking, just validators reaching agreement. It's fast, cheap, and environmentally friendly.
Developer Experience: Academic vs Practical 🎓
NEAR: Learn Once, Build Anything
NEAR's development feels modern and flexible:
The Good:
- Great documentation that doesn't assume you have a CS degree
- Testing framework that actually works reliably
- Human-readable addresses make UX so much better
- Cross-contract calls let you build complex applications
- JavaScript support lowers the barrier to entry
The Frustrating:
- You're building a lot of infrastructure from scratch
- Gas estimation can be tricky for complex contracts
- Storage staking confuses new users constantly
- Smaller ecosystem means fewer examples to learn from
XRP Ledger: Specialized but Powerful
XRP Ledger development is focused but incredibly robust:
The Awesome:
- Built-in features are battle-tested and secure
- Transaction costs are practically zero
- Documentation is thorough (if a bit technical)
- No smart contract bugs because there are no custom smart contracts (mostly)
- Perfect for payment applications
The Limiting:
- Less flexible for non-payment use cases
- Learning curve is steep if you're used to other blockchains
- Smaller developer community
- Most examples are in languages you probably don't use
When I Choose What (Real Decision Making) 🎯
After building production apps on both:
I Pick NEAR When:
- Building social applications or games
- Need flexible smart contract functionality
- Team is comfortable with JavaScript/Rust
- Want to experiment with new blockchain patterns
- Users appreciate human-readable addresses
- Cross-chain functionality is important
I Pick XRP Ledger When:
- Building payment or fintech applications
- Need maximum transaction throughput at minimal cost
- Security is more important than flexibility
- Working with traditional finance institutions
- Don't want to reinvent financial primitives
- Regulatory clarity matters
The Ecosystem Reality 🌍
NEAR: Growing but Niche
NEAR's ecosystem is smaller but feels alive:
- Lots of experimentation with social features
- Growing DeFi ecosystem (Ref Finance, etc.)
- Strong focus on user experience improvements
- Chain signatures opening up cross-chain possibilities
- Everyone knows everyone, very collaborative community
XRP Ledger: Mature but Focused
XRP Ledger's ecosystem is specialized:
- Heavily focused on payments and remittances
- Established partnerships with actual banks and fintechs
- Less experimental, more production-ready solutions
- Strong institutional adoption
- Smaller but very knowledgeable developer community
Real Production Lessons 📚
NEAR Learnings:
- Users love human-readable addresses way more than I expected
- Cross-contract async calls need bulletproof error handling
- Storage staking requires significant user education
- The social layer features are genuinely innovative when used right
- Multi-chain architecture often makes more sense than NEAR-only
XRP Ledger Insights:
- The built-in features are more powerful than they initially seem
- Transaction costs being essentially zero changes user behavior
- Working with traditional finance requires different thinking than DeFi
- The validator model is more centralized but also more stable
- Not everything needs a smart contract to be useful
Tools That Actually Matter 🛠️
NEAR Stack:
-
near-cli- Simple and reliable -
near-workspaces- Testing framework that works - Aurora - Ethereum compatibility when needed
- NEAR Social - Built-in social features
XRP Ledger Stack:
-
rippled- The core server software - XRPL libraries - Available in most programming languages
- Bithomp/XRPScan - Block explorers
- XUMM - Popular wallet with good API
My Hot Takes (That Might Be Wrong) 🔥
XRP Ledger is underrated by developers because it doesn't fit the "smart contracts for everything" narrative
NEAR is building for a future that might not exist - social blockchain applications are still mostly theoretical
Both will survive because they're not really competing - different use cases entirely
The payment use case is bigger than most devs realize - not everything needs to be DeFi or NFTs
Built-in features beat custom smart contracts for 90% of financial applications
Looking Ahead: What's Coming 🔮
NEAR keeps pushing boundaries with chain signatures, social features, and cross-chain functionality. They're betting on a future where blockchain feels like the web.
XRP Ledger is adding smart contract capabilities while keeping their core focus on payments. The EVM sidechain gives developers flexibility while maintaining the main ledger's simplicity.
Neither will "kill" Ethereum, but both serve specific niches really well.
The Bottom Line (What Really Matters) 💰
After a year of building on both platforms:
NEAR is great for experimental applications, social features, and anything that benefits from flexible smart contracts. Choose it when you're building something new and need maximum flexibility.
XRP Ledger is perfect for payment applications, especially if you need institutional-grade reliability and minimal costs. Choose it when you're building financial infrastructure that needs to work perfectly every time.
They're not competitors - they're different tools for different jobs.
Final Thoughts (Getting Real) 💭
The biggest lesson from this experience? Stop looking for the "best" blockchain and start thinking about which blockchain best serves your specific use case.
NEAR excels at innovation and developer happiness. XRP Ledger excels at doing one thing incredibly well. Both approaches have value depending on what you're building.
The future isn't about one blockchain winning - it's about using the right blockchain for each specific application.
What's your experience with NEAR or XRP Ledger? Drop your thoughts in the comments - I'm always curious to hear how other developers approach these platform decisions!
P.S. - If this helped you understand these platforms better, give it some love. Writing about blockchain development while maintaining sanity requires significant caffeine investment ☕
Top comments (0)