I'm a Tailwinds convert. We don't use Tailwinds on Forem, but we have an approach inspired by it — and could some day fully adopt it. But I reach for it in my own things.
If I'm not using that, I'm typically using nothing. I find CSS frameworks to bring a lot of set up burden, so I'll generally go dependency-free if it's a small thing I want to get out the door.
Pure CSS ( With Sass Preprocessor ). Simple, Minimalist, DRY. As an added benefit, HTML is also cleaner as it does not require unnecessary multiple deeply nested containers.
I use framer motion for animation and tailwindcss, but I might transition from framer to regular css animation because framer is not the lightest package out there
I think it is good to learn CSS. It is not that complicated. After that you will not need a CSS framework. Then in the future you have the choice to use a CSS framework if you want or if a job requires that you use one.
I was stuckkkk on Bulma for a while, then I got introduced to Tailwind and I've been using it ever since (a little over a week now to be exact 😅). It felt kinda intimidating at first but I guess it was just one of those things that takes getting used to.
I am a frontend developer focused in creating application with React, Vue and Svelte. Currently, I am a software engineering student at Kasetsart University.
I mainly use WindiCSS. It is Tailwind but not a PostCSS plugin. It's really good for speedrunning development. I also use experimental UnoCSS which is basically WindiCSS but lighter and have less features.
Oldest comments (29)
I use a framework called mdb it works for react, angular, vue and vanilla js the ui looks cool
I'm a Tailwinds convert. We don't use Tailwinds on Forem, but we have an approach inspired by it — and could some day fully adopt it. But I reach for it in my own things.
If I'm not using that, I'm typically using nothing. I find CSS frameworks to bring a lot of set up burden, so I'll generally go dependency-free if it's a small thing I want to get out the door.
Agreed vanilla css is go-to.
Tailwind!! I am really loving it!
Pure CSS ( With Sass Preprocessor ). Simple, Minimalist, DRY. As an added benefit, HTML is also cleaner as it does not require unnecessary multiple deeply nested containers.
Agreed. Classic.
I use framer motion for animation and tailwindcss, but I might transition from framer to regular css animation because framer is not the lightest package out there
I just do it raw. Throw in some BEM and PostCSS and I'm set.
I think it is good to learn CSS. It is not that complicated. After that you will not need a CSS framework. Then in the future you have the choice to use a CSS framework if you want or if a job requires that you use one.
Yeah.
I was stuckkkk on Bulma for a while, then I got introduced to Tailwind and I've been using it ever since (a little over a week now to be exact 😅). It felt kinda intimidating at first but I guess it was just one of those things that takes getting used to.
Tailwind for sure is good
I have also went from Bulma to Tailwind!
Woot woot! 💯
Vanilla CSS. I don't like putting my styling in the HTML, and when I have to take that shortcut, I'll just use inline
styles.I mainly use WindiCSS. It is Tailwind but not a PostCSS plugin. It's really good for speedrunning development. I also use experimental UnoCSS which is basically WindiCSS but lighter and have less features.