I personally use Conventional Commits standard, however what you say is 💯% correct. They can can be a bit verbose, specifically the header for things like "refactor:" which takes up so many of my precious header chars!
A new member of our team introduced me to this standard and I liked how fun it was.
The main thing is to agree on a standard that works for your team, because that enables you to do so much more.
Hi, great content!
I personally use Conventional Commits standard, however what you say is 💯% correct. They can can be a bit verbose, specifically the header for things like "refactor:" which takes up so many of my precious header chars!
A new member of our team introduced me to this standard and I liked how fun it was.
The main thing is to agree on a standard that works for your team, because that enables you to do so much more.
Keep up the good work!
About a standard, the gitmoji project changes. So yes it is needed to agree on a standard.