Well, honestly, why should it have to face any hurdles, like with your last example of security, since it wouldn't be any more than a shortening of the current syntax, so whatever you can do with that, you could do with this.
And again, why not just support <script src=""/>?
Just have it be an accepted way of doing it, like you said, how it handles <svg>. Personally, I see nothing wrong with this approach, and I don't see why this hasn't really been corrected for the sake of HTML tag length.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Well, honestly, why should it have to face any hurdles, like with your last example of security, since it wouldn't be any more than a shortening of the current syntax, so whatever you can do with that, you could do with this.
And again, why not just support
<script src=""/>?Just have it be an accepted way of doing it, like you said, how it handles
<svg>. Personally, I see nothing wrong with this approach, and I don't see why this hasn't really been corrected for the sake of HTML tag length.