How an AI Assistant Helped Me Go From Zero to Deploying My First Cypress Project
Three weeks ago, I knew almost nothing about end-to-end testing. Today, I have a working Cypress project running automated tests via GitHub Actions, all documented and showcased on my GitHub profile. This transformation didn't happen through expensive bootcamps or months of grinding through documentation. It happened through a series of strategic conversations with Claude AI.
Here's how I turned curiosity into competence, one question at a time.
The Starting Point: "What Even Is End-to-End Testing?"
My journey began with the broadest possible question. I opened Claude and simply asked: "What is end-to-end testing?"
Instead of getting lost in Wikipedia rabbit holes or scattered blog posts, I received a clear, structured explanation that positioned E2E testing within the broader testing landscape. Claude explained how E2E testing differs from unit and integration testing, why it matters, and when teams actually use it in real projects.
What struck me immediately was how Claude framed everything in practical terms. Rather than theoretical definitions, I learned that E2E testing means simulating real user interactions—clicking buttons, filling forms, navigating pages—to ensure the entire application works as intended from the user's perspective.
This initial conversation gave me the conceptual foundation I needed. I wasn't just learning what E2E testing was; I was understanding why it exists and where it fits in modern development workflows.
Building a Learning Roadmap: The 3-Day Plan
With a solid understanding of the concept, I needed structure. I asked Claude: "Can you give me a 3-day learning schedule for E2E testing at a basic level?"
Claude delivered a focused, practical roadmap:
Day 1 was about fundamentals—understanding testing concepts, setting up Cypress, and writing my first simple test. The schedule included specific topics like CSS selectors, basic assertions, and the Cypress Test Runner.
Day 2 ramped up to intermediate concepts—working with forms, handling asynchronous behavior, organizing tests with before/after hooks, and creating custom commands for reusable test logic.
Day 3 focused on real-world application—implementing Page Object Models for maintainability, adding GitHub Actions for continuous integration, and documenting everything properly.
What made this roadmap valuable wasn't just the content breakdown but the realistic time allocations. Claude suggested 2-3 hours per day, acknowledging that deep learning happens in focused sessions, not marathon coding binges.
I followed this plan loosely, sometimes spending extra time on areas that challenged me, but having that structure prevented me from getting overwhelmed or lost in tangential topics.
From Theory to Practice: Designing My Showcase Project
Learning testing in a vacuum felt pointless. I needed a project—something simple enough to complete quickly but substantial enough to demonstrate real skills on GitHub.
I asked Claude: "What's a simple project I can build to showcase E2E testing skills?"
Claude suggested building tests for a todo application, but not just any todo app. The recommendation was to either find an existing public demo application or create a minimal one myself, then build a comprehensive test suite around it.
The reasoning was brilliant: hiring managers and other developers scrolling through GitHub don't want to wade through complex applications to understand what you've built. They want to see clean, well-documented testing patterns applied to something immediately understandable.
I ended up choosing a public todo demo application and built my test suite around it. My repository would showcase:
- Clear test organization and naming conventions
- Proper use of Cypress commands and assertions
- Custom commands for common operations
- Page Object Model implementation
- GitHub Actions integration
- Comprehensive README documentation
This approach meant my project could serve as both a learning exercise and a portfolio piece—dual purpose that maximized the value of my time investment.
Wrestling with Reality: Writing and Debugging My First Tests
Theory is comfortable. Implementation is messy.
My first attempts at writing Cypress tests were humbling. Selectors didn't work. Tests failed for mysterious reasons.
This is where Claude's conversational nature became invaluable. Rather than posting on Stack Overflow and waiting hours for responses, I could paste error messages, share my code, and get immediate, contextual debugging help.
When my test couldn't find a button element, Claude helped me understand CSS selector specificity and suggested using data-cy attributes for more reliable targeting.
Each debugging session taught me not just how to fix the immediate problem but why the problem occurred and how to avoid similar issues in the future. This iterative, conversational learning felt more like pair programming than reading documentation.
The Compound Effect of Guided Learning
Looking back over these few weeks, what strikes me most is the efficiency of learning with an AI assistant. I didn't waste time on outdated tutorials or irrelevant tangents. Every question I asked received a focused, contextual response tailored to my current understanding level.
The learning path wasn't linear—it was conversational. When something didn't make sense, I could immediately ask for clarification or examples. When I wanted to go deeper on a topic, I could follow that thread without losing sight of my main goal.
This approach worked because Claude served multiple roles simultaneously: teacher, documentation, debugging partner, and project advisor. Instead of context-switching between multiple resources, I had one consistent conversational thread that adapted to my needs.
Top comments (0)