Teams don’t need to feel good. They need to feel safe being honest. That’s where breakthrough performance lives.
⸻
It’s easy to mistake team harmony for psychological safety.
Everyone laughs on Zoom. Emojis fly around in Slack. But real psychological safety reveals itself when things go wrong. When a deploy breaks production. When someone misses a critical deadline. When an unpopular opinion enters the room.
The most effective teams don’t avoid mistakes—they metabolize them. But that only happens when people trust they won’t be punished for honesty. When something breaks, do your engineers start documenting the issue and jump in to help? Or do they go quiet, hoping someone else speaks up first?
Your litmus test: Watch your next post-mortem.
Teams with genuine psychological safety focus on what broke in the system, not who broke it. They hunt for flawed processes, unclear ownership, and missing guardrails—not scapegoats.
And leaders set that tone from the top. When production goes down, your response matters more than the incident itself. Stay calm. Ask curious, not accusatory, questions. Guide the team toward better safeguards—not blame.
You’re reinforcing a simple truth:
Failure is data, not a character flaw.
⸻
When Safety is Structure, Not Sentiment
Without psychological safety, innovation dies. People self-censor. Problems fester underground. Mediocrity becomes the ceiling.
But with it? You unlock:
- Transparent communication
- Accelerated learning
- Genuine shared ownership
Teams that feel safe don’t just work better. They grow faster, learn faster, and recover faster. They stop playing defense—and start playing offense.
⸻
From the Field: When Blame Poisoned the Room
I once ran a major production escalation. Clients were calling. Engineers were digging deep across three time zones. Everyone was focused, collaborative, and aligned.
Then a VP from another division joined the call.
Within two minutes, they poisoned the room. Instead of asking how to help, they asked:
“Who pushed this code? Who missed the review? Who caused this?”
Immediately, I saw the shift.
People went quiet. Ideas stopped flowing. Engineers moved from collaboration to self-protection.
That’s when I stepped in:
“Hold up. Right now, we’re focused on stopping the bleeding and understanding what broke. Once we’re stable, we’ll examine what failed in our process—not our people—so this doesn’t happen again.”
The room reset. Collaboration resumed. And crucially, my team saw that doing the hard work of honest analysis wouldn’t get them thrown under the bus.
Psychological safety isn’t something you preach.
It’s something you protect—especially when the pressure is high.
⸻
💡 Try This: Reframe the Post-Mortem
Next time something breaks—production incident, missed deadline, anything—open your post-mortem like this:
"We’re not here to find who screwed up. We’re here to find what let us down—the process gaps, communication failures, and system blind spots that made this inevitable."
Then prove it.
Dissect the conditions, not the people. Look for:
- Broken handoffs
- Missing safeguards
- Unclear ownership
When your team sees that failure triggers investigation, not interrogation, something shifts.
People raise red flags earlier. They admit mistakes faster. They stop hiding.
That’s where trust—and performance—takes root.
⸻
🔗 Further Reading:
What People Get Wrong About Psychological Safety
Amy Edmondson & Michaela Kerrissey, HBR
This sharp piece cuts through common misconceptions. Safety isn’t about comfort—it’s about honesty under pressure. A must-read if you want your team to stop walking on eggshells and start solving real problems.
⸻
💬 Open Threads
- When have you felt most supported during a high-pressure moment?
- What rituals or systems could you put in place to de-stigmatize mistakes?
- If someone made a critical error today, would they tell you right away?
⸻
✉️ Like this kind of thinking?
I write a weekly newsletter for engineering leaders focused on building high-trust, high-output teams.
Subscribe here → 📬 Beyond the Commit
Top comments (0)