What if you could make your Angular applications faster and lighter with just a few tweaks to your components and libraries?
Tree-shaking is one of the most effective optimization techniques for Angular applications. It removes dead code from your builds, reducing the size of your application, speeding up load times, and improving performance. However, if you're using standalone components instead of traditional NgModules, there are some specific best practices you’ll want to follow to ensure that your application is tree-shakable.
By the end of this article, you’ll learn how to optimize Angular applications using standalone components and tree-shaking. You’ll also see interactive demo codes and tips for making sure your Angular libraries are modular and optimized for production.
What Is Tree-Shaking and Why Is It Important for Angular Standalone Components?
Tree-shaking is a technique that eliminates unused code from your final production build. When working with standalone components in Angular, the Angular build process can eliminate unused components, services, and utilities that aren't referenced anywhere in your application, thus making your app lighter and faster.
Key Benefits of Tree-Shaking:
- Smaller Bundle Sizes: By removing unused code, tree-shaking reduces the final bundle size.
- Faster Load Times: Smaller bundle sizes lead to quicker initial loads.
- Better Application Performance: Optimized code helps your application perform faster, as the browser has less to process.
How to Make Your Standalone Components Tree-Shakable
Angular standalone components introduced in Angular 14 allow you to create self-contained, reusable components without relying on NgModules
. To ensure your standalone components are tree-shakable, follow these steps:
1. Use Standalone Components Properly
Standalone components should be self-contained and only export the necessary parts. This helps Angular’s tree-shaking algorithm determine which components can be removed during the build process.
Example:
import { Component } from '@angular/core';
@Component({
selector: 'app-my-component',
template: `<p>{{ message }}</p>`,
standalone: true
})
export class MyComponent {
message = 'Hello from Standalone Component!';
}
In the above example, MyComponent
is a standalone component, and the standalone: true
property signals Angular to treat it independently.
2. Export Only What’s Necessary
To ensure tree-shaking works efficiently, only export what’s necessary for your app. Avoid including unnecessary logic or services in your component.
Example:
export { MyComponent } from './my-component';
This way, if the MyComponent
isn’t used in the final application, it will be tree-shaken away during the build.
3. Avoid Dynamic Imports
Dynamic imports (i.e., import()
statements) can prevent tree-shaking because the build tool can't determine what to exclude. Stick to static imports for tree-shaking to work efficiently.
Correct Syntax:
import { MyComponent } from './my-component';
4. Prefer ES6 Modules
Ensure you are using ES6 module syntax (import
and export
). Tree-shaking works best with this syntax because it provides clear boundaries for what can be included or excluded.
Correct Syntax:
export class MyService {}
Interactive Demo Code: Optimizing Standalone Components for Tree-Shaking
Let’s go through an interactive Angular application setup using standalone components optimized for tree-shaking. Here’s how you can structure the application:
Step 1: Set Up a Basic Standalone Component
Generate a simple standalone component using the Angular CLI.
ng generate component my-component --standalone
This creates a new standalone component (my-component
) under src/app/my-component
.
Step 2: Create a Simple Service
Let’s create a service that is only included when the component is used.
// my-library.service.ts
export class MyService {
getData() {
return 'Hello from MyService!';
}
}
Step 3: Export the Service Only If Needed
In your component, make sure you are only including the necessary services and logic.
import { MyService } from './my-library.service';
@Component({
selector: 'app-my-component',
standalone: true,
template: '<p>{{ message }}</p>',
providers: [MyService]
})
export class MyComponent {
message = this.myService.getData();
constructor(private myService: MyService) {}
}
This way, if MyComponent
or MyService
is not used in the final build, it will be removed by the tree-shaker.
Best Practices for Tree-Shaking Standalone Components
- Keep Components Small and Modular: Break your components into small, reusable pieces. This makes it easier for tree-shaking to identify unused parts.
- Lazy Load Components When Possible: Use lazy loading to load only the components needed for a given route, keeping your initial load time minimal.
- Avoid Global Side Effects: Avoid writing code that modifies global variables or uses side effects that can’t be excluded during build-time optimization.
-
Build with Production Settings: Always use
ng build --prod
for tree-shaking to work effectively, as the production build enables Angular’s optimization features.
Final Thoughts
By following the best practices outlined in this article, you can ensure that your Angular applications — particularly those using standalone components — are optimized for tree-shaking. This will result in smaller, faster, and more efficient applications that provide better user experiences.
What You’ve Learned:
- The importance of tree-shaking in Angular applications with standalone components.
- How to structure your components and services to ensure tree-shaking works properly.
- Practical demo code to help you implement these techniques.
What do you think? Did you find these tips helpful? Have you already optimized your Angular app using tree-shaking? Leave a comment below to share your experiences or ask any questions you might have!
For more such content, follow me for regular updates on Angular, JavaScript optimization, and best practices!
🎯 Your Turn, Devs!
👀 Did this article spark new ideas or help solve a real problem?
💬 I'd love to hear about it!
✅ Are you already using this technique in your Angular or frontend project?
🧠 Got questions, doubts, or your own twist on the approach?
Drop them in the comments below — let’s learn together!
🙌 Let’s Grow Together!
If this article added value to your dev journey:
🔁 Share it with your team, tech friends, or community — you never know who might need it right now.
📌 Save it for later and revisit as a quick reference.
🚀 Follow Me for More Angular & Frontend Goodness:
I regularly share hands-on tutorials, clean code tips, scalable frontend architecture, and real-world problem-solving guides.
- 💼 LinkedIn — Let’s connect professionally
- 🎥 Threads — Short-form frontend insights
- 🐦 X (Twitter) — Developer banter + code snippets
- 👥 BlueSky — Stay up to date on frontend trends
- 🌟 GitHub Projects — Explore code in action
- 🌐 Website — Everything in one place
- 📚 Medium Blog — Long-form content and deep-dives
- 💬 Dev Blog — Free Long-form content and deep-dives
🎉 If you found this article valuable:
- Leave a 👏 Clap
- Drop a 💬 Comment
- Hit 🔔 Follow for more weekly frontend insights
Let’s build cleaner, faster, and smarter web apps — together.
Stay tuned for more Angular tips, patterns, and performance tricks! 🧪🧠🚀
Top comments (0)