I don't like xargs *builds own xargs*
I don't like xargs
xargs
*builds own xargs*
Is there any specific reason for not just using the out-of-the-box xargs instead though?
Also, xargs has the -p option, which can be used to get some parallelism out of your shellscripts.
-p
Because of other comments about xargs everywhere I'll be doing a post soon explaining why xargs is almost always a last resort.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Is there any specific reason for not just using the out-of-the-box
xargs
instead though?Also,
xargs
has the-p
option, which can be used to get some parallelism out of your shellscripts.Because of other comments about xargs everywhere I'll be doing a post soon explaining why xargs is almost always a last resort.