DEV Community

Discussion on: `at` coming soon to ECMAScript

Collapse
 
dsm637 profile image
Denis Mitropolsky

Honestly, I don't think getting the last is the real reason for "at"

Collapse
 
fjones profile image
FJones

Well then... What is? The only benefits over indices seem to be that it throws on non-array and that you can use valid negative indices.

For negative indices, the main purpose is most definitely .at(-1), since anything dynamic still requires knowing the .length, and anything less than -1 implies a data structure that should probably be an object in the first place.
And if I want to throw on non-array, I'll just use TypeScript.

 
dsm637 profile image
Denis Mitropolsky

Throws on non-array seems to me a real reason for using "at". TypeScript is not everywhere yet and even it is, there's still "any".

 
ashleyo profile image
Ashley Oliver

You would implement a stack as an object? Trippy ...