Let's be honest: how much of the last podcast you listened to do you actually remember?
If you’re like most people, the answer is probably "not much." We spend hours every week consuming incredible, life-changing advice from the world's smartest people, only for it to vanish from our minds within 48 hours. The gap between listening and doing is massive.
Here’s the free AI trick I use to fix it.
The Trick: From Podcast to Action Plan in 60 Seconds
Here’s the only step you need:
Grab the YouTube URL of the podcast you want to analyze.
Open Google's NotebookLM and click “Create New“.
Click “Youtube” and paste the URL as a new source.
Use this prompt in the chat:
You are an expert tech analyst specializing in translating broad concepts into actionable advice for software engineers. My goal is to extract the most relevant and applicable ideas from this source for my work.
Instructions:
Analyze the provided source from the perspective of a software engineer. Identify the top 3 concepts, mental models, or strategies that are most applicable to the field of software engineering.
For each concept you identify, present it using the following clear and concise structure. Do not ask me questions; provide the information directly.
### 🚀 Concept 1: [Name of the Concept]
* **Simple Explanation:** In 1-2 sentences, what is this concept in simple terms, according to the podcast? provide a direct quote from the speaker that best encapsulates the idea.
* **Relevance for Engineers:** Why is this concept particularly relevant to software development, team dynamics, problem-solving, or system architecture?
* **Actionable Application:** Provide one concrete example of how I can apply this concept in my work this week. (e.g., a question to ask in a code review, a principle for designing a new feature, a way to communicate with my team).
The real magic here is the first line: "You are an expert..." This is called "prompting with a persona," and it's the key to getting hyper-relevant results.
You can, and should, change this to suit your own life and work. Pro-Tip: You can use an LLM to edit the prompt for you.
Putting It to the Test: A Real-World Example
I ran this exact workflow on a recent podcast from Lenny Rachitsky
about Mercado Libre:
Here’s the output from NotebookLM:
As an expert tech analyst, I’ve analyzed the provided source to identify the most relevant and applicable concepts for software engineers. Here are the top three, presented with actionable advice for your work:
🚀 Concept 1: Integrated Product-Engineering Ownership
• Simple Explanation: At Mercado Libre, there’s a deliberate blurring of lines between engineering and product roles, with a strong emphasis on engineers taking significant ownership of product decisions. The aim is not to determine ownership by title, but by who is best suited for the role, often the engineering leaders themselves. As Sebastian Barrios states, “it’s hard to separate where engineering stops and product begins and we don’t feel like just having a title should determine who is the owner”
• Relevance for Engineers: This concept is profoundly relevant to software development because it pushes engineers beyond mere technical implementation into a holistic understanding of the product, users, and business needs. It fosters a deeper sense of responsibility and accountability for the product’s success, ensuring that technical feasibility aligns seamlessly with user value and business objectives. Engineers are expected to combine understanding of “what’s technically possible” with “what are the business needs what are the user needs what are the users doing how am I going to measure that”.
• Actionable Application: When designing or implementing a new feature this week, actively engage with its business and user context. Before writing code, ask yourself: “How will the user experience this flow, and are they understanding it?”. Consider the feature’s intended user impact and how its success would be measured, rather than just focusing on the technical requirements alone.
🚀 Concept 2: Bias for Deep Technical Expertise
• Simple Explanation: Mercado Libre places a high value on engineers who possess deep technical knowledge and are intimately familiar with the details of the technology they use. There is a “strong bias for engineering for for for being technical for being deep into the details”. This means a low tolerance for superficial understanding or deferring to others for technical specifics.
• Relevance for Engineers: For software engineers, this mental model emphasizes the critical importance of technical mastery. It promotes building robust, scalable systems and allows engineers to lead discussions effectively without needing to consult others for fundamental technical information. This deep technical understanding is crucial for efficient problem-solving, architectural decisions, and maintaining a high quality of deployments.
• Actionable Application: In your next technical discussion or code review, be prepared to articulate the underlying technical details of your solution or a component you’re reviewing. Instead of saying “I need to check with this person to understand the details,” strive to provide a comprehensive explanation of the technology, its choices, and its implications yourself.
🚀 Concept 3: Empowering Risk-Taking and Learning from ‘Market’ Failures
• Simple Explanation: The company fosters a culture where teams are encouraged to take risks and are not penalized for releasing features that might fail due to market reception or flawed ideas. Sebastian Barrios states, “we actually empower our teams to to to make mistakes like no one’s going to get fired for releasing something that didn’t work in the sense that maybe the market was not ready or we had the wrong idea on on on where had to implement”. This contrasts with a low tolerance for failures related to bad quality or system outages.
• Relevance for Engineers: This strategy is vital for innovation in software development. It enables engineers to experiment with new ideas and features, fostering creativity and a rapid learning cycle without the paralyzing fear of negative repercussions for outcomes outside of technical quality. It directly supports a “high speed of execution” in a dynamic market by prioritizing learning and adaptation.
• Actionable Application: This week, when proposing a new feature or a significant change, frame it as an experiment with clear hypotheses about user or market reception. Be explicit about the assumptions being tested and how success or failure (in terms of market fit, not technical quality) will provide valuable learning for future iterations. This approach encourages bold visions and swift pivots if initial assumptions prove incorrect.
Just the Tip of the Iceberg
And that’s the core of the trick. It’s a simple, repeatable system for turning passive consumption into active growth.
NotebookLM is a powerful tool that can do much more, but I wanted to keep this article short and focused on the one workflow that has given me the most leverage.
If you found this useful and are interested in more content like this, please let me know! The best way to do that is to leave a comment or hit the 👏 button below.
I’ll be happy to share more tips and tricks on how I use AI for learning and productivity. Let me know what you’d like to see next.
Top comments (0)