very nice to see someone using actual research to make a point. id like to add that ultimately wed need more than a single study to validate the results. but if they hold out, its still not an endorsement of typescript since, as stated in the research, it is only one of the various ways one can add types to javascript. as a long time c# and java developer im very comfortable using types but i dont believe typescript is the answer for javascript.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I'm just throwing this in here: earlbarr.com/publications/typestud...
PS: Very valid points but presented in a poor manner set out to spark debate. Shame really.
very nice to see someone using actual research to make a point. id like to add that ultimately wed need more than a single study to validate the results. but if they hold out, its still not an endorsement of typescript since, as stated in the research, it is only one of the various ways one can add types to javascript. as a long time c# and java developer im very comfortable using types but i dont believe typescript is the answer for javascript.