Great post. My personal preference would be to use .some() instead of .includes() as it will return early as soon as it resolves true, where .includes() will go through every item in the array when it probably doesn't need to. I would also agree that nested ternary is very hard to read so I would probably avoid that if I had to nest multiple conditions and just fall back to good old fashioned if/else.
Great post. My personal preference would be to use .some() instead of .includes() as it will return early as soon as it resolves true, where .includes() will go through every item in the array when it probably doesn't need to. I would also agree that nested ternary is very hard to read so I would probably avoid that if I had to nest multiple conditions and just fall back to good old fashioned if/else.
But this is really useful, thank you.
Thanks for your feedback !