I stumbled upon this while writing my own and wanted to point out something.
You cannot rely on isNaN() for checking if something is a number. You can use it to check if the input provided to isNaN() will cause further NaN values. If that makes sense.
Using it the way you have, true and false will result in true is a number.
Hey there skptricks!
I stumbled upon this while writing my own and wanted to point out something.
You cannot rely on
isNaN()for checking if something is a number. You can use it to check if the input provided toisNaN()will cause furtherNaNvalues. If that makes sense.Using it the way you have,
trueandfalsewill result intrue is a number.Here's a function I wrote to check if something is a number: codepen.io/grok/pen/LvOQbW?editors...