Thanks for the article ! ,but I have a small remark regarding that javascript has now real classes,it's not true, javascript is always prototype-based, the class keyword is no more than syntactical sugar , because believing the language has real classes can lead to confusion in developement especially when comparing to other class-based languages.
The prototype approach of JavaScript is more flexible than the stuff that other languages are doing. In fact, most people did implement their own class system on top of it, the ES2015 class syntax is just a standardization of these systems.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Thanks for the article ! ,but I have a small remark regarding that javascript has now real classes,it's not true, javascript is always prototype-based, the class keyword is no more than syntactical sugar , because believing the language has real classes can lead to confusion in developement especially when comparing to other class-based languages.
This is true.
The prototype approach of JavaScript is more flexible than the stuff that other languages are doing. In fact, most people did implement their own class system on top of it, the ES2015
classsyntax is just a standardization of these systems.