View this post on alexcarpenter.me
The other week I was working on a side project where I needed to consecutively return a random item from an arr...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Another way to do it is to create an array that contains every item except the current one, and then take a random item from that:
Definitely, but it seemed more performant to not create a new array using filter on every click.
It's hard to know, right? I would guess the average performance for my version is worse, for the reason you mentioned. But the worst-case performance for your version is worse, because in theory that loop can spin and spin until the random number generator picks a different fruit.
But really, the performance costs we're talking about aren't important, if they only happen once per human click interval. I'd favor readability... if I could just decide which one was more readable.
... Anyway, I just think it's fun to see multiple ways to do things.