Let’s be honest. The biggest problem in our industry isn’t a lack of tools or talent. It’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what quality actually is, how you achieve it, and what it really costs when you ignore it.
Teams talk about "shifting left" and "quality culture," but these are just empty buzzwords without a plan. You wouldn't build a house by putting up the roof first, right? You start with a solid foundation, then the walls, then the roof, and after all that you continue with the systems inside. Building quality is no different.
This isn't just a roadmap for QAs. It's for every single person involved in building software who is tired of the cycle of shipping fast and breaking things.
Phase 1: Foundation (Culture, Roles & Mindset)
Everything starts here. You can hire the most expensive professionals and you can buy the most expensive tools, but if your culture is broken, you're just accelerating your ability to produce garbage. This phase is non-negotiable.
A Shared Definition of "Quality": Before you write a line of code, the team must agree on what "quality" means for your product. Is it speed? Reliability? A bug-free UI? If everyone has a different definition, you're all aiming at different targets.
Quality is Everyone's Responsibility: The "Whole Team" approach is the only way. Quality is not a department you send things to. It's a collective standard that everyone upholds.
Psychological Safety: This is non-negotiable. Team members must feel safe to say, "I'm concerned about this," without fear of blame. Without this, you're blind to the biggest risks.
Visible Leadership Buy-In: Leaders must actively champion quality. When they prioritize fixing tech debt over rushing a new feature, they show the team what truly matters.
The Blameless Retrospective: When something goes wrong, the question is never "Who did this?" It's "How did our process allow this to happen?" Every mistake is a full team responsibility, and the goal is to remediate the system, not the person.
Redefining the QA Role: The shift from gatekeeper to quality coach is critical. Stop finding bugs at the end. Start asking questions at the beginning. You are a quality advocate embedded in the team from day one.
Defining the Developer's Role: Developers own the quality of their code. Period. This means writing clean, maintainable code and owning foundational testing like unit and integration tests. The QA role is not a safety net for sloppy work. By inspection you cannot improve quality, you can only characterize it.
Understanding the Domain In-Depth: QAs are the glue between business and technology. They should actively breaking down siloes on the team.
Establish Equal Authority between Devs and QAs: They need to be on equal footing, otherwise it is little brother telling big brother what they can and cannot do.
Phase 2: Pre-Development (Requirements, Estimation & Planning)
With a solid foundation, you can start drawing the blueprints. This is where you prevent entire classes of bugs before they are ever written.
Crafting High-Quality, Testable User Stories: A story that is vague or untestable is a recipe for disaster. Teams must establish clear standards for what makes a story "ready for development."
Defining Concrete Acceptance Criteria (ACs): Good ACs are explicit and binary—they either pass or fail. This removes ambiguity and ensures everyone is on the same page about what "done" means.
Implementing "Three Amigos" Sessions: These can't be passive review meetings. Make them active working sessions. The goal is to leave with a shared understanding and clearly defined ACs, not just to pretend we accomplished something.
Identifying Edge Cases & Negative Paths Upfront: This is a primary task for a QE. Your job is to think like a user who will do everything wrong. What happens with invalid input? What if the network fails? Answering these questions now saves days of rework later.
Defining and Integrating Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs): Don't let performance, security, or accessibility be an afterthought. These NFRs must be discussed and integrated into user stories from the beginning.
Risk-Based Prioritization of Quality Efforts: You can't test everything with the same depth. Use risk analysis to focus your efforts on the most critical and fragile parts of the application.
Making Quality a Factor in Story Estimation: Quality isn't free. The effort for writing tests, pairing, and exploratory testing must be included in story points. It's a bad practice to miss this, as it just hides the true cost of work.
Early Test Data & Environment Planning: Before a single line of code is written, you should be asking, "How are we going to test this?" This means planning for the necessary test data and environment access upfront.
Phase 3: In-Development (In-Sprint Quality)
This is the construction phase. Quality is built-in, not bolted on. These items are the engine of in-sprint quality.
A Fast and Reliable Continuous Integration (CI) Pipeline: Every commit should trigger an automated build and a fast set of tests. This provides immediate feedback and prevents integration hell.
Enforced Code Quality Standards & Static Analysis: Use automated tools like linters and static analysis to catch bugs and style issues before they ever reach a human reviewer. This is your first line of automated defense.
Mandatory, Effective Peer Reviews (Pull Requests): Code reviews are not just for finding bugs. They are for sharing knowledge, ensuring maintainability, and upholding team standards. Make them mandatory and constructive.
In-Sprint Dev-QA Collaboration & Pairing: This is a game-changer. Pair-testing—a dev and QA working together on a feature—creates an immediate feedback loop and demolishes the "us vs. them" wall. It is extremely helpful.
Early and Continuous Exploratory Testing: As soon as a piece of a feature is usable, a QA should be exploring it. This is creative, human-driven testing that finds the bugs automation will always miss.
Definition of "Ready for QA/Review": This should be part of your Definition of Done. It's a simple checklist that prevents friction and ensures smooth handoffs.
Phase 4: Formal Testing & Automation
Notice how late this phase is? Building automation on a broken process is a waste of money. Only with the other phases in place you can build a strategy that provides real value.
Implementing the End-to-End (E2E) Testing Strategy: Don't try to automate everything. Focus E2E tests on the most critical user journeys that provide the highest value.
Building a Scalable & Maintainable Automation Framework: The two silent killers of any automation effort are bad architecture and poor test data management. I use Playwright with TS and the Page Object Model, but the tool is less important than the principles of clean, maintainable design.
A Stable & Consistent Test Environment Strategy: A flaky test environment makes your test results meaningless. The environment must be reliable and as production-like as possible.
Robust Test Data Management: If you spend more time managing test data than writing tests, your strategy has failed. You need a clear, repeatable process for getting the data you need.
Integrating Automation into the CI/CD Pipeline: Strategically run your tests. Run quick smoke tests on every PR, a larger regression suite on every merge to main, and full E2E runs before a release.
Defining a Performance Testing Baseline: You don't need a massive performance team to start. Run baseline load tests on critical user flows to ensure you don't introduce major regressions.
Implementing a Basic Security Testing Checklist: Integrate automated security scans (SAST/DAST) into your pipeline to catch common vulnerabilities early.
Cross-Browser & Cross-Device Testing Strategy: Define what browsers and devices you officially support and have a clear strategy for ensuring a consistent experience across them.
Phase 5: Release & Post-Release
Your job isn't done when the feature ships. The ultimate measure of quality is how your product behaves in the hands of real users.
A Staged Rollout Strategy: Minimize risk with canary releases or blue-green deployments. Roll out new features to a small percentage of users first to ensure stability before a full release.
Comprehensive Production Monitoring & Alerting: This is your product's insurance. It should tell you there's a problem long before a customer does.
Effective Log Management & Analysis: When an issue occurs, structured, searchable logs are your best tool for rapid root cause analysis.
User-Facing Feedback Channels: Make it easy for users to tell you when something is wrong. An in-app feedback form or a dedicated channel is a direct line to the user experience.
A Culture of Continuous Improvement: Use all the data from production—monitoring alerts, user feedback, performance metrics—to feed back into the development process.
Conclusion
Quality Engineering is a mindset, not a role. For a proper implementation in the software development lifecycle, we, as QEs, must follow best practices and improve the process step-by-step as we spread the values and benefits of it.
And if you're at a startup thinking, "This is too slow and heavy for us" let me ask you a simple question.
You created this startup to win in the market, right? If you put garbage in the market, you will receive the same from it.
Top comments (0)