If you’ve ever ended a coding session feeling amazing...
Only to realize days later that nothing real was shipped —
You’ve experienced the dark side of vibe coding.
This post is not about what vibe coding is. It’s about why it feels so good — and why that feeling can quietly sabotage real engineering.
The Illusion of Progress
Vibe coding creates a powerful illusion: motion without direction.
You:
- Generate components
- Refactor randomly
- Rename variables
- Try new libraries
- Ask AI to “improve” things
Your editor is full of code. Your GitHub shows commits. Your brain says: “I’m being productive.”
But ask yourself one brutal question:
“If I stopped today, could a real user use this?”
Most of the time, the answer is no.
Why Vibe Coding Feels So Productive (Psychology Matters)
Vibe coding taps into the same dopamine loop as infinite scrolling, loot boxes, and short-form content. Here’s why:
1️⃣ Instant Feedback
- Traditional coding: Think → write → debug → fail → fix
- Vibe coding: Prompt → generate → “wow”
That "wow" moment tricks your brain into rewarding effort before value actually exists.
2️⃣ Low Friction = High Momentum
There’s no resistance.
- No architecture decisions
- No edge cases
- No documentation
- No tests
Low friction feels like speed. But speed without direction is just running in circles.
3️⃣ Visual Progress > Functional Progress
UIs appear fast. APIs scaffold instantly. Folders look “complete”.
But:
- No real flows are finished
- No edge cases handled
- No real constraints applied
You’re decorating a house without plumbing.
Vibe Coding Is Exploration — Not Engineering
This is the part many people don’t like to hear: Vibe coding is not engineering.
And that’s not an insult.
What Vibe Coding Actually Is:
- Exploration
- Ideation
- Experimentation
- Learning by exposure
What Engineering Actually Is:
- Constraints
- Trade-offs
- Reliability
- Maintainability
- Accountability
Engineering begins where vibes end.
Why Vibe Coding Often Produces “Almost Projects”
You know these projects. They look impressive on first glance, but break on the second click. They are hard to explain in interviews, and you always "plan to clean it later."
These projects fail because the transition never happens.
There is a missing step: Turning exploration into intention.
Most people never cross that bridge.
The Vibe Coding Trap (Especially for Students)
Students fall into this trap harder than anyone.
Why?
Because AI gives them working code, tutorials give them confidence, and no one demands stability.
So they build:
- Projects they can’t debug
- Systems they can’t explain
- Features they can’t defend
In interviews, this shows up as:
“It works, but I’m not sure why.”
That sentence kills offers.
Why Teams Don’t “Vibe Code” (Even If They Want To)
Teams don’t avoid vibe coding because it’s bad. They avoid it because it’s unshareable.
Vibe-coded systems have unclear intent, inconsistent patterns, no agreed structure, and no obvious ownership.
Engineering requires predictability, standards, and shared mental models. Vibes don’t scale. Systems do.
The Most Dangerous Part: False Confidence
The worst outcome of vibe coding isn’t bad code. It’s false confidence.
You believe you’re further along than you are. You think the hard part is done and cleanup is “easy later.”
In reality, cleanup is the hard part. Hard decisions were postponed, and technical debt is already locked in.
When Vibe Coding Is Actually Powerful
Vibe coding is incredible when used intentionally. It shines when:
- Exploring ideas
- Learning new stacks
- Prototyping flows
- Breaking creative blocks
But it must be followed by engineering discipline.
The Real Skill Nobody Talks About
The most valuable skill in 2025 isn’t vibe coding. It’s knowing when to stop.
It's knowing when to say:
- “Now we refactor”
- “Now we add tests”
- “Now we document”
- “Now we delete half this code”
That transition is what separates hobby projects from products, students from engineers, and code generators from system builders.
Final Thought
Vibe coding doesn’t fail. Stopping too late does.
Use vibe coding to explore.
Use engineering to ship.
Confuse the two—and you’ll stay busy forever without building anything that lasts.
Top comments (0)