Arjun was in his second year of college when doubt quietly crept in.
It wasn’t triggered by a failed exam or a bad grade. It came from scrolling LinkedIn late at night. Every few posts, someone was celebrating a new certification—AWS, Google UX, Meta Frontend, Coursera specializations. Badges, certificates, congratulatory comments.
It looked official. It looked like progress.
Arjun wasn’t doing badly. He understood the basics. He had written some code. He had built a few projects. But nothing about his work felt validated. Nothing felt concrete enough to point at and say, “This proves I’m ready.”
So he did what felt like the responsible move.
He bought a certification.
Not because a recruiter asked for it. Not because a company demanded it. But because it felt like a safe step forward—structured, recognized, and measurable.
The Illusion of Competence
A few months later, the certificate was complete.
Arjun had learned a lot. He understood new terms. He could follow best practices on paper. He even added the badge to his resume and LinkedIn profile. From the outside, it looked like growth.
But something felt off.
When he tried to explain what he had learned to a friend, his answers felt shallow. When he revisited his own projects, he realized he still relied heavily on tutorials and references. The certificate had given him exposure—but not ownership.
That’s when it hit him.
The certificate proved he had studied the domain. It didn’t prove he could work in it.
Where the Conversation Becomes Dishonest
This is where most conversations about certifications become dishonest.
Certifications aren’t useless. They do provide structure, especially for beginners. Platforms like Coursera, edX, Udemy, LinkedIn Learning, and Pluralsight are excellent at creating guided learning paths. They expose students to industry language, common patterns, and foundational ideas. For someone starting out, that structure can be incredibly helpful.
But structure is not the same as experience.
Completing a course shows discipline and intent. It doesn’t automatically translate to problem-solving ability, debugging confidence, or architectural judgment. Those skills only emerge when things break and you’re forced to fix them.
The Domain Matters
The value of certifications also changes drastically depending on the domain:
- Web Development: Certificates rarely act as hiring proof. Frontend, backend, and full-stack roles are evaluated through projects, code quality, and the ability to explain decisions. A React or full-stack certificate without real projects behind it is a weak signal. However, when paired with a solid GitHub repository and clear explanations, it can support your profile rather than define it.
- Cloud Computing & DevOps: Certifications carry more weight here. Platforms like AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud have standardized tools where mistakes can be expensive. Here, certifications often act as trust signals, especially for entry-level roles. They don’t replace experience, but they reduce perceived risk for employers.
- Design (UI/UX): Certifications tell an even smaller part of the story. Certificates from Google or the Interaction Design Foundation can help with structured thinking, but hiring decisions are driven almost entirely by portfolios and case studies. No certificate can replace the ability to explain user problems, design trade-offs, and iteration choices.
- Cybersecurity: Certifications can be valuable, but only when backed by hands-on practice. Credentials like Security+, CEH, or CISSP mean little without lab work and real-world scenarios. Security is a domain where theoretical knowledge collapses quickly under pressure.
Filters, Not Guarantees
What most certification platforms don’t explain is that certifications are designed as filters, not guarantees.
Recruiters may notice them. Automated systems may parse them. But interviews are still won through understanding, not badges. A certificate might open a door—but it won’t carry you through it.
The real danger appears when students treat certifications as replacements instead of complements. When certificates become a substitute for projects, experimentation, and failure, they create a false sense of readiness. That confidence collapses the moment real problems appear.
The Realization
Arjun eventually realized this.
After finishing his certification, he went back to his projects. He rebuilt one from scratch. He broke things intentionally. He tried to explain his decisions in simple words. He stopped chasing completion and started chasing understanding.
The certificate didn’t get him hired. But it gave him a map—and he finally chose to walk the path himself.
So, are certifications worth the money?
- Sometimes — yes.
- Always — no.
They are tools, not shortcuts. They work best when used intentionally, alongside real work, curiosity, and accountability. A certification should support your story, not replace it.
Before buying one, it’s worth asking a simple question:
“What problem will this certification help me solve?”
If you can answer that clearly, it’s probably worth it. If you can’t, waiting might be the smarter move.
Have you ever bought a certification that you felt didn't actually help you learn? Let me know in the comments below!
Top comments (0)