No, I actually worked with it and discovered the many things Tailwind just cannot do, without very dirty workarounds. Also, its Tailwind that is trying to replace CSS, you're writing class names, not CSS.
I actually worked with it and discovered the many things Tailwind just cannot do, without very dirty
Like what?
you're writing class names, not CSS
You understood CSS wrong. It's all about composing classes and reuse it. You should write more reusable CSS as you can to do not repeat it again and again. Tailwind provides a shortcut to skip the writing CSS for general purpose styles and avoid a lot of duplicates.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Everyday a TW hater bringing JS oriented style as argument to replace CSS.
No, I actually worked with it and discovered the many things Tailwind just cannot do, without very dirty workarounds. Also, its Tailwind that is trying to replace CSS, you're writing class names, not CSS.
Like what?
You understood CSS wrong. It's all about composing classes and reuse it. You should write more reusable CSS as you can to do not repeat it again and again. Tailwind provides a shortcut to skip the writing CSS for general purpose styles and avoid a lot of duplicates.