Exactly. I think almost anything is better than any.
any
In the example above we could go from number[] to (number | string)[], instead of resorting to any[]. Or generics, depending on the case.
number[]
(number | string)[]
any[]
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Exactly. I think almost anything is better than
any.In the example above we could go from
number[]to(number | string)[], instead of resorting toany[]. Or generics, depending on the case.