I almost feel like Github is trying to follow suit with what Gitlab is doing. Gitlab has a lot of features, including built-in CI.
I don't feel like Github is trying to destroy their partners, I feel like they're trying to remain competitive with their competitors.
It won't keep me from using Codacy for static code analysis or Travis for continuous integration.
Going into the future, I don't think that Github's strengths and niche within the industry will change all that much. They are still excellent for collaboration and source control, and I think they always will be. For CI and static analysis, there will always be some great vendors that integrate well with Github.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I almost feel like Github is trying to follow suit with what Gitlab is doing. Gitlab has a lot of features, including built-in CI.
I don't feel like Github is trying to destroy their partners, I feel like they're trying to remain competitive with their competitors.
It won't keep me from using Codacy for static code analysis or Travis for continuous integration.
Going into the future, I don't think that Github's strengths and niche within the industry will change all that much. They are still excellent for collaboration and source control, and I think they always will be. For CI and static analysis, there will always be some great vendors that integrate well with Github.