DEV Community

loading...

Discussion on: Why is Isomorphic JavaScript not longer talked about?

Collapse
khrome83 profile image
Zane Milakovic

I actually think people don’t do it, because it’s difficult to do in general, even before you get to the trade off and side effects. Hence the use of tooling to solve it.

Next, Nuxt, Sapper are great products. Though Sapper is very much weaker in term of features and maturity.

But the other trade offs are kind of ignored.

I think it’s a great concept for DX when it works and things work well. But users do not care. And the extra complications can lead to more bugs and less desirable outcomes.

That being said. Keeping a frontend and a backend code base seperate can also, because you may arguable have more code. Every situation is different. I like to start with the needs of the user experience and let that guide decisions.

Thread Thread
arobu profile image
Andrei D. Robu Author

So then the problem is not "solved", it's still a challenge and whether or not it's worth it can only be decided on a case by case basis 👍.

Thread Thread
khrome83 profile image
Zane Milakovic

Yeah. It’s better and can be worth it for sure. But it can make things more complex. Your really have to go in and do things the way the tooling allows.