If Endtest is using Appium, I believe that's another topic. According to the official doc
Appium's flagship support for automating Android apps is via the UiAutomator2 driver
Espresso is much more fast, and have lots of other advantages like very good at test RecyclerView.
Do you have any studies or data to support your claim that Espresso is faster than UiAutomator2? I'm curious to learn more about that.
From google official training course
Espresso tests run optimally fast! It lets you leave your waits, syncs, sleeps, and polls behind while it manipulates and asserts on the application UI when it is at rest.
From 3rd introduction
In my opinion, the first trait is Espresso faster than Ui Automator.
Espresso was built by Google. Your first source is literally from Google. And your second source is an article published on Medium by someone.
None of those articles contain any comparison data.
I was hoping for something more reliable, that would include data, measurements, comparisons, etc.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
If Endtest is using Appium, I believe that's another topic. According to the official doc
Espresso is much more fast, and have lots of other advantages like very good at test RecyclerView.
Do you have any studies or data to support your claim that Espresso is faster than UiAutomator2?
I'm curious to learn more about that.
From google official training course
From 3rd introduction
Espresso was built by Google.
Your first source is literally from Google.
And your second source is an article published on Medium by someone.
None of those articles contain any comparison data.
I was hoping for something more reliable, that would include data, measurements, comparisons, etc.