I'm a web developer, graphic designer, type designer, musician, comicbook-geek, LEGO-collector, food lover … as well as husband and father, located just south of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amazing collection! I used the "Basic 3" on a recent project, but had a CSS validation error, that boiled down to linear-gradient(currentColor 0 0).
Is that a short way of writing linear-gradient(to bottom, currentColor 0 0, currentColor 100% 0)?
And, as to bottom is default, that can be omitted I guess?
It's the short way of writing linear-gradient(currentColor,currentColor). The direction and the color stops aren't important since a gradient between two same colors will always give that color. I am defining two colors stop for it (0 and 0) to write the color only once inside the gradient.
The syntax I am using is a bit uncommon but it's valid. The CSS validator is never up to date anyway.
I wrote a recent article about this if you want: css-tricks.com/cool-hover-effects-...
I'm a web developer, graphic designer, type designer, musician, comicbook-geek, LEGO-collector, food lover … as well as husband and father, located just south of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amazing collection! I used the "Basic 3" on a recent project, but had a CSS validation error, that boiled down to
linear-gradient(currentColor 0 0).Is that a short way of writing
linear-gradient(to bottom, currentColor 0 0, currentColor 100% 0)?And, as
to bottomis default, that can be omitted I guess?It's the short way of writing
linear-gradient(currentColor,currentColor). The direction and the color stops aren't important since a gradient between two same colors will always give that color. I am defining two colors stop for it (0and0) to write the color only once inside the gradient.The syntax I am using is a bit uncommon but it's valid. The CSS validator is never up to date anyway.
I wrote a recent article about this if you want: css-tricks.com/cool-hover-effects-...
Cool, didn’t know that syntax!