State management in React has evolved dramatically. Gone are the days when Redux was your only choice for complex applications. Today's atomic state management libraries offer fine-grained reactivity, minimal boilerplate, and better performance. But which one should you choose?
The Rise of Atomic State Management
Traditional state management forces entire components to re-render when any part of the state changes. Atomic state management flips this approach - only components subscribed to specific pieces of state update when those pieces change.
This granular approach offers several key benefits:
- Performance: Eliminates unnecessary re-renders
- Simplicity: No complex provider trees or reducer boilerplate
- Scalability: Independent state atoms that don't interfere with each other
- Developer Experience: Intuitive APIs that feel natural to use
Popular Solutions: Jotai and Zustand
Jotai: Bottom-Up Atomic Approach
import { atom, useAtom } from 'jotai'
const countAtom = atom(0)
const nameAtom = atom('John')
function Counter() {
const [count, setCount] = useAtom(countAtom)
return <button onClick={() => setCount(c => c + 1)}>{count}</button>
}
Pros: True atomic approach, excellent for complex data relationships
Cons: Requires wrapping your app in a Provider, atoms scattered across files
Zustand: Simple Global Store
import { create } from 'zustand'
const useStore = create((set) => ({
count: 0,
increment: () => set((state) => ({ count: state.count + 1 })),
}))
function Counter() {
const { count, increment } = useStore()
return <button onClick={increment}>{count}</button>
}
Pros: No providers needed, simple API, great for global state
Cons: Not truly atomic - all subscribers update when any state changes
Enter Nucleux: The Best of Both Worlds
Nucleux combines the atomic precision of Jotai with the simplicity of Zustand, while adding some unique advantages:
import { Store, useNucleux } from 'nucleux'
class CounterStore extends Store {
count = this.atom(0)
name = this.atom('John')
increment() {
this.count.value += 1
}
}
function Counter() {
const { count, increment } = useNucleux(CounterStore)
return <button onClick={increment}>{count}</button>
}
Why Nucleux Wins
1. True Atomic Updates, Zero Providers
Unlike Jotai, Nucleux requires no providers. Unlike Zustand, it offers genuine atomic updates - only components using count
re-render when count changes, not components using name
.
2. Organized State Architecture
Instead of scattered atoms or monolithic stores, Nucleux uses classes to group related state and methods logically:
class TodoStore extends Store {
todos = this.atom([])
filter = this.atom('all')
// Derived state that auto-updates
filteredTodos = this.deriveAtom(
[this.todos, this.filter],
(todos, filter) => todos.filter(/* filter logic */)
)
addTodo(text) {
this.todos.value = [...this.todos.value, { id: Date.now(), text }]
}
}
3. Built-in Dependency Injection
Need one store to react to another? Nucleux makes it effortless:
class NotificationStore extends Store {
userStore = this.inject(UserStore)
notifications = this.atom([])
constructor() {
super()
// Auto-load notifications when user changes
this.watchAtom(this.userStore.currentUser, (user) => {
if (user) this.loadNotifications(user.id)
})
}
}
4. Automatic Persistence
Save state to localStorage or AsyncStorage with zero boilerplate:
class UserStore extends Store {
// Automatically persists to localStorage
preferences = this.atom({ theme: 'dark' }, 'user-prefs')
}
5. Three Ways to Access State
Choose the right tool for each component:
// Just the methods
const store = useStore(TodoStore)
// Single atom value
const todos = useValue(TodoStore, 'todos')
// Everything at once
const { todos, filter, addTodo } = useNucleux(TodoStore)
Performance Comparison
Feature | Jotai | Zustand | Nucleux |
---|---|---|---|
Atomic Updates | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
No Providers | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
Organized Architecture | ❌ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
Built-in Persistence | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Dependency Injection | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
The Bottom Line
While Jotai and Zustand are excellent libraries, Nucleux offers the complete package:
- Atomic precision without provider complexity
- Organized architecture that scales with your team
- Built-in features that eliminate common boilerplate
Ready to simplify your React state management? Give Nucleux a try in your next project.
Want to see Nucleux in action? Check out the live demo or visit nucleux.dev for complete documentation.
Top comments (0)
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.