I forgot about Houdini, but I had read about how complex it is to develop a CSS polyfill compared to a JS polyfill.
I think this is one of the most important features about JS moving fast. Right now you can use transpilers, for sure, but for the things that are not already implemented, then you have a good polyfill waiting for you. (Web Components, to say something). I hope with Houdini API developers that do CSS polyfill have a better work, and can implement new features faster.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I forgot about Houdini, but I had read about how complex it is to develop a CSS polyfill compared to a JS polyfill.
I think this is one of the most important features about JS moving fast. Right now you can use transpilers, for sure, but for the things that are not already implemented, then you have a good polyfill waiting for you. (Web Components, to say something). I hope with Houdini API developers that do CSS polyfill have a better work, and can implement new features faster.