Detecting Phishing Patterns in Rust: An Unconventional Approach without Documentation

Cybersecurity remains a critical field, with phishing attacks representing a significant threat to individuals and organizations alike. Traditional detection systems rely heavily on comprehensive datasets and detailed documentation, but what happens when the challenge is approached with minimal guidance? In this blog post, we explore a practical implementation where a security researcher develops a phishing pattern detector using Rust, a language renowned for its safety and performance, despite the absence of proper documentation.

The Challenge

When building security tools, especially for anomaly detection like phishing, understanding data patterns is crucial. Typically, this involves vast annotated datasets, auxiliary libraries, and documentation to navigate complex logic. But in this scenario, the developer faces a sparse environment: the goal is to identify suspicious URLs, patterns, and behaviors indicative of phishing attacks, relying solely on empirical coding and code analysis.

The Rust Strategy

Given Rust's strengths in performance and safety, it is an excellent choice for real-time detection systems. However, without documentation, the developer must lean heavily on code introspection, pattern matching, and efficient data structures. The approach involves several core steps:

1. Pattern Matching with Regex

use regex::Regex;

fn is_suspicious_url(url: &str) -> bool {
    let patterns = vec![
        r"\.com\.ru",        // Suspicious TLDs
        r"[0-9]{3,}",        // Numeric sequences
        r"@",                 // Embedded email addresses
        r"//",                // Path anomalies
        r"\.\./",            // Directory traversal
    ];
    for pattern in patterns {
        let re = Regex::new(pattern).unwrap();
        if re.is_match(url) {
            return true;
        }
    }
    false
}

This function highlights the use of regex patterns to identify common phishing traits, such as suspicious TLDs or embedded numbers.

2. URL Parsing with url Crate

use url::Url;

fn analyze_url(url_str: &str) -> bool {
    match Url::parse(url_str) {
        Ok(parsed_url) => {
            // Check host patterns
            if parsed_url.host_str().unwrap_or("").ends_with(".ru") {
                return true;
            }
            // Check path length
            if parsed_url.path_segments().map(|segments| segments.count()).unwrap_or(0) > 3 {
                return true;
            }
        },
        Err(_) => return true, // Malformed URLs are suspicious
    }
    false
}

Parsing URLs allows the detection of obfuscation tactics, such as long paths or suspicious host domains.

3. Combining Heuristics

fn is_phishing(url: &str) -> bool {
    is_suspicious_url(url) || analyze_url(url)
}

Combining multiple heuristics increases detection robustness.

Reflection and Performance

While the lack of documentation initially posed a barrier, relying solely on code analysis enforced a direct understanding of detection strategies. Rust's safety features minimize runtime errors, and its ownership model ensures efficient resource management, making it suitable for deployment in high-throughput environments.

Challenges and Takeaways

• Absence of documentation requires developers to generate their own understanding of the problem space.
• Pattern matching and URL parsing are powerful tools but need constant updates to counter evolving phishing tactics.
• Rust's ecosystem, including crates like regex and url, provides solid foundations even without external documentation, assuming familiarity with their APIs.

In conclusion, building a phishing detector in Rust without proper documentation may be unorthodox but can lead to efficient, secure, and adaptable systems. Continuous refactoring and empirical validation are essential, especially when working with minimal initial guidance.

Stay vigilant, and leverage the safety features of Rust to develop resilient cybersecurity tools.

---

🛠️ QA Tip

I rely on TempoMail USA to keep my test environments clean.