I like your implementation. I have one concern to share with you. Don't you think that the UserInterface for instance is violating the idea of CQRS in common? Because in CQRS you are splitting your writes from your reads and in this case, your repository might only have to have one read method to load the aggregate by its ID while it case persist the aggregate
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I like your implementation. I have one concern to share with you. Don't you think that the UserInterface for instance is violating the idea of CQRS in common? Because in CQRS you are splitting your writes from your reads and in this case, your repository might only have to have one read method to load the aggregate by its ID while it case persist the aggregate