Most practical GenAI systems are not model-centric.
They are retrieval-centric.
The model is the interface. Retrieval is the system.
Why raw model knowledge is insufficient
Large language models are trained on static data.
That means:
- Knowledge is stale
- Domain context is missing
- Source attribution is impossible
- Corrections cannot propagate
For real systems, this is unacceptable.
Accuracy, freshness, and traceability must come from outside the model.
Retrieval as a first-class component
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works because it shifts responsibility.
The system:
- Decides what information is relevant
- Controls what the model can see
- Grounds generation in known data
The model’s job becomes synthesis, not recall.
This separation is critical.
Why chunking and indexing matter more than prompts
Most RAG failures are not model failures.
They come from:
- Poor chunk boundaries
- Missing metadata
- Overly broad retrieval
- Latency-heavy pipelines
Retrieval quality determines output quality long before the model is involved.
Retrieval changes system design
Once retrieval exists:
- Context windows become manageable
- Hallucinations reduce naturally
- Models become interchangeable
- Behavior becomes inspectable
At that point, GenAI systems start to resemble search systems with a generative layer on top.
That’s a good thing.
The next post looks at cost, latency, and failure as design constraints rather than afterthoughts.
Top comments (0)