Named functions are more recognizable and readable in stack traces. When you're debugging, that can make a large difference in how many hairs you pull out (or have left at the end).
Arrow notation to me is more useful when the function is "really functional": without side-effect, without impact on internal or external data, and repeatable. I see it more for "spontaneous" functions being passed to high order functions.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Named functions are more recognizable and readable in stack traces. When you're debugging, that can make a large difference in how many hairs you pull out (or have left at the end).
Arrow notation to me is more useful when the function is "really functional": without side-effect, without impact on internal or external data, and repeatable. I see it more for "spontaneous" functions being passed to high order functions.