If you want to tweak the behaviour of value replacement differently for some values, you can use mergeWith. It's quite similar what the library is accomblishing.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I should have given an example. Normally I am using the following pattern, for default nested options:
If you want to tweak the behaviour of value replacement differently for some values, you can use
mergeWith
. It's quite similar what the library is accomblishing.