That's crazy amount of setup required. Cannot imagine why would any startup prefer aws over heroku/netlify/glitch/etc for node deployments. It maybe a little cheaper but the amount of work overweights this benefit.
1) Regarding NodeJS - as @moviemaker93
wrote, with Elactic Beanstalk you can deploy backend in the "Heroku style"
2) As for React FE - the best practice is deploy to S3. It's static site after all.
why would any startup prefer aws over heroku/netlify/glitch/etc
AWS is providing much more services and flexibility. Plus it's cheaper.
1) okay, tomayto, tomahto, no pros for aws here anyway
2) best practice to deploy static apps to s3? Well, maybe if you have it fully set up in aws, for someone who has, not there is no reason to choose it over netlify/gh-pages
AWS is providing much more services and flexibility. Plus it's cheaper.
I did not say aws does not provide value. I said that aws is too complicated and for startup it will always be easier to work with saas solutions that either cost nothing or dirt cheap. AWS will always be for those who have devops or at least a very skillful backend engineer that can dedicate some time to setup deployments
for startup it will always be easier to work with saas solutions
AWS has a lot of services, and this article is using the IaaS, while there are many SaaS solutions from AWS.
IMHO, Heroku is nice for MVP/PoC or side projects, but on the next steps company should go to AWS/GCP.
PS: unfortunately, I'm not getting $$ from AWS :-(
Although in my company we still use heroku for half of web applications deployments. It is still cheaper at at larger scale to buy dynos than to either lose developers time with aws or devoting someone with aws knowledge.
Yee setup is crazy, but maybe with fargate or elasticbeanstalk would have been simpler. But as said by vaibhav this is nice article to get familiar with basic setup on aws. Nice work!
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
That's crazy amount of setup required. Cannot imagine why would any startup prefer aws over heroku/netlify/glitch/etc for node deployments. It maybe a little cheaper but the amount of work overweights this benefit.
Yes, but I think this could be for people to get familiar with AWS.
Vercel also is a great choice for node deployment, just a few commands!
1) Regarding NodeJS - as @moviemaker93 wrote, with Elactic Beanstalk you can deploy backend in the "Heroku style"
2) As for React FE - the best practice is deploy to S3. It's static site after all.
AWS is providing much more services and flexibility. Plus it's cheaper.
1) okay, tomayto, tomahto, no pros for aws here anyway
2) best practice to deploy static apps to s3? Well, maybe if you have it fully set up in aws, for someone who has, not there is no reason to choose it over netlify/gh-pages
AWS is providing much more services and flexibility. Plus it's cheaper.
I did not say aws does not provide value. I said that aws is too complicated and for startup it will always be easier to work with saas solutions that either cost nothing or dirt cheap. AWS will always be for those who have devops or at least a very skillful backend engineer that can dedicate some time to setup deployments
AWS has a lot of services, and this article is using the IaaS, while there are many SaaS solutions from AWS.
IMHO, Heroku is nice for MVP/PoC or side projects, but on the next steps company should go to AWS/GCP.
PS: unfortunately, I'm not getting $$ from AWS :-(
Heroku is nice for MVP/PoC or side projects
That's what i meant.
Although in my company we still use heroku for half of web applications deployments. It is still cheaper at at larger scale to buy dynos than to either lose developers time with aws or devoting someone with aws knowledge.
Yee setup is crazy, but maybe with fargate or elasticbeanstalk would have been simpler. But as said by vaibhav this is nice article to get familiar with basic setup on aws. Nice work!