Automation often fails silently amid real-world conditions: RPCs time out, gas spikes push calls past budgets, and nodes get rate-limited. If you’ve shipped anything serious in Web3, you know this pain: polling loops, retries, failover logic, and a monitoring job that never stops.
Those shared-infra outages and RPC limits aren’t theoretical. Major node providers have had outages that took wallets and dapps offline for hours, forcing teams into emergency mode.
Kwala removes that entire surface area of failure. It is an event-driven execution layer that listens at the protocol level, routes events into declarative YAML workflows, and runs them verifiably on the Kalp Network. No polling, RPC wrangling, or infra babysitting.
Why RPC failures break automation
Polling is brittle by design. When you poll an RPC, you are constantly betting on three things: availability, latency, and consistent indexing. In practice, that means you must account for:
Per-chain RPC endpoints and provider rate limits
Congestion and gas spikes that change success conditions mid-run
Sync drift that forces log reprocessing and complex backfills
Failover logic that becomes its own mini-infrastructure
Research shows RPC services are an attractive attack surface and a single point of failure for dApps. Academic work has demonstrated practical attacks against RPC services that can deny service to clients. Along with that, real-world outages have also repeatedly shown that centralized providers can become critical choke points.
How Kwala listens with the chain, not around it
Instead of polling, Kwala runs a permissioned automation layer on Kalp Network where nodes observe block-level activity in real time. When a contract emits an event, the network routes that event into the execution engine and triggers your YAML workflow. That means your logic fires close to chain finality, not on an arbitrary polling cadence.
Key outcomes:
Near-instant event handling at block-level granularity
No per-chain RPC plumbing in your stack
Built-in failover and deterministic execution semantics
On-chain, auditable execution records for post-mortem and compliance
Node providers and tooling vendors publish status pages because outages happen. Moving from client-side polling to a networked, event-driven execution layer removes the majority of the operational surface you and your team would otherwise own.
Polling vs event-driven execution: a practical comparison
Concern
Polling-based automation
Kwala event-driven layer
Latency
Delayed, seconds to minutes
Near-instant, block-level
Infra management
Multiple RPCs, cron jobs, job runners
None required in your repo
Failover complexity
Manual and ad-hoc
Built into Kalp Network nodes
Auditability
External logs or none
On-chain, replayable traces
Multichain
One RPC per chain to manage
Native multichain via YAML config
YAML in practice: a VotePassed example
You want a workflow that reacts to a DAO vote and releases treasury funds if a proposal passes. With Kwala, you write one small file and deploy it:
trigger:
- contract_event: contract: "0xDAO" event: "VotePassed"
actions:
- call_contract: function: "releaseFunds" contract: "0xTreasury"
No setInterval loops, no web3.js polling, no fragile retries. An event triggers the Kalp Network, which runs the workflow, executes the action, and records the result on-chain for auditability.
Why Verifiable Workflows Matter for protocol teams and product builders
Latency that matches the chain: Your automation should reflect chain finality, not polling schedules.
Resilience without redundancy engineering: Stop building bespoke failover systems; rely on deterministic execution.
Verifiable execution: Each run becomes a signed, replayable artifact you can inspect during post-mortems or audits.
Multichain without multiple node stacks: Configure chain targets in YAML rather than provisioning separate node fleets.
All of these remove cognitive and maintenance load from teams that should be shipping product logic, not firefighting infra.
Operational safety: fewer surprises, clearer failure modes
RPC rate limits, provider throttling, and unexpected outages often lead to cascading operational debt, which includes duplicate transactions, missed events, and silent failures that only become visible once users report them. Best practices around RPC security and access rules mitigate risk, but they do not eliminate the maintenance and edge cases. Moving execution logic closer to the chain and into an auditable execution layer reduces the number of moving parts you must operate and reason about.
Next step, stop treating RPC as a product
If your automation relies on polling, you carry a permanent infrastructure burden. Write workflows that run with the chain instead of around it. Express your logic in YAML, test in the Kwala Playground, and deploy to the Kalp Network. Your automation becomes deterministic, auditable, and resilient, and your team can focus on product behaviour rather than keeping RPC calls alive.
Top comments (0)