What is Zero-Knowledge Proof: Complete Guide to ZKPs, zk-SNARKs, and zk-STARKs
Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) represent one of the most revolutionary cryptographic innovations of our time, fundamentally changing how we approach privacy, security, and trust in digital systems. These powerful mathematical protocols enable one party to prove knowledge of specific information to another party without revealing the actual information itself—a concept that seems paradoxical but has profound implications for blockchain technology, digital identity, and data privacy.
Understanding Zero-Knowledge Proofs
A zero-knowledge proof is a cryptographic method that allows multiple parties to verify a statement's truth without revealing information beyond the statement itself. Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) are an innovative cryptographic method that enables a party (the prover) to validate a claim to another (the verifier) without disclosing any detailed information about the claim itself.
The concept was first introduced in the 1985 paper "The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems" by Shafi Goldwasser, Silvio Micali, and Charles Rackoff. They provide a definition that has aged remarkably well and remains the foundation for all modern zero-knowledge proof systems.
How Zero-Knowledge Proofs Work
At a high level, a zero-knowledge proof works by having the verifier ask the prover to perform a series of actions that can only be performed accurately if the prover knows the underlying information. If the prover is only guessing as to the result of these actions, then they will eventually be proven wrong by the verifier's test with a high degree of probability.
The Cave Example
There is a well-known story presenting the fundamental ideas of zero-knowledge proofs, first published in 1990 by Jean-Jacques Quisquater and others in their paper "How to Explain Zero-Knowledge Protocols to Your Children." The two parties in the zero-knowledge proof story are Peggy as the prover of the statement, and Victor, the verifier of the statement.
In this story, Peggy has uncovered the secret word used to open a magic door in a cave. The cave is shaped like a ring, with the entrance on one side and the magic door blocking the opposite side. Victor wants to know whether Peggy knows the secret word; but Peggy, being a very private person, does not want to reveal her knowledge (the secret word) to Victor or to reveal the fact of her knowledge to the world in general.
A conceptual example to intuitively understand proving data in zero-knowledge is to imagine a cave with a single entrance but two pathways (path A and B) that connect at a common door locked by a passphrase. Alice wants to prove to Bob she knows the passcode to the door but without revealing the code to Bob.
Essential Properties of Zero-Knowledge Proofs
Interactions powered by ZKPs must satisfy the following three fundamental properties:
Completeness
If a statement is true, an honest prover should easily be able to convince a verifier of this. This ensures that valid proofs will always be accepted when the statement is actually true.
Soundness
If a statement is false, a dishonest prover should not be able to trick a verifier. Unless the prover actually possesses the secret knowledge (like the solution to the Sudoku), it's almost impossible for them to generate a proof that a verifier would accept as true.
Zero-Knowledge
Neither party can extract additional private information about one another. The verifier learns nothing beyond the validity of the statement being proven.
Types of Zero-Knowledge Proofs
Interactive vs. Non-Interactive Proofs
ZKPs can either be interactive—where a prover convinces a specific verifier but needs to repeat this process for each individual verifier—or non-interactive—where a prover generates a proof that can be verified by anyone using the same proof.
Interactive proofs are uncommon in blockchain-based systems, as they are inefficient and it is generally undesirable to require two parties to be online at the same time.
zk-SNARKs: Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge
The acronym zk-SNARK stands for Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge and refers to a proof construction where one can prove possession of certain information, e.g., a secret key, without revealing that information, and without any interaction between the prover and verifier.
Key Features of zk-SNARKs:
Succinct: "Succinct" zero-knowledge proofs can be verified within a few milliseconds, with a proof length of only a few hundred bytes even for statements about programs that are very large.
Non-Interactive: In "non-interactive" constructions, the proof consists of a single message sent from prover to verifier.
Trusted Setup: Prior to Halo, the most efficient known way to produce zero-knowledge proofs that are non-interactive and short enough to publish to a block chain was to have an initial setup phase that generates a common reference string shared between prover and verifier.
zk-STARKs: Zero-Knowledge Scalable Transparent Arguments of Knowledge
zk-STARK stands for Zero-Knowledge Scalable Transparent Argument of Knowledge and is a zero-knowledge proof system that was introduced as an alternative to SNARKs in a 2018 paper by Eli Ben-Sasson, Iddo Bentov, Yinon Horesh, and Michael Riabzev.
Key Advantages of zk-STARKs:
Transparent Setup: Unlike the first generation of zk-SNARKs, zk-STARKs, by default, do not require a trusted setup, which makes them particularly useful for decentralized applications like blockchains.
Scalability: Additionally, zk-STARKs can be used to verify many statements at once, making them scalable and efficient.
Quantum Resistance: STARKs use hash functions as their source of security, which differs from the bilinear implementation used by SNARKs, making them potentially quantum-resistant.
Real-World Applications
Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
The first widespread application of zk-SNARKs was in the Zerocash blockchain protocol, where zero-knowledge cryptography provides the computational backbone, by facilitating mathematical proofs that one party has possession of certain information without revealing what that information is.
Zcash was the first widespread application of zk-SNARKs, a novel form of zero-knowledge cryptography. The strong privacy guarantee of Zcash is derived from the fact that shielded transactions in Zcash can be fully encrypted on the blockchain, yet still be verified as valid under the network's consensus rules by using zk-SNARK proofs.
Layer 2 Scaling Solutions
Perhaps the most well-known application of zk-SNARKs to date lies within blockchain technology. Blockchains must reach consensus on the validity of each transaction, which can be computationally costly and limit scalability. zk-SNARKs help tackle these challenges through rollups—zk-SNARKs pave the way for "rollups," a scaling solution for blockchains like Ethereum. Transactions are executed off-chain and 'rolled up' into a single proof of validity for on-chain verification.
Identity and Authentication
In these use cases, zero-knowledge proofs eliminate the need to disclose private information while ensuring that only authorized individuals or entities access sensitive systems or data. For instance, a voter could authenticate their eligibility in an election without revealing personal details such as their address or voting history.
Enterprise Solutions
EY (Ernst & Young) has developed Nightfall, a solution primarily using zk-SNARKs to add privacy and optimize complex supply chains for businesses. It enables confidential transactions on the Ethereum blockchain, allowing businesses to collaborate without revealing sensitive pricing, inventory, or production data.
Comparing zk-SNARKs and zk-STARKs
zk-SNARKs Advantages:
Small proof sizes, which makes SNARKs suitable for applications where bandwidth and storage are limited
Fast verification times
Mature technology with widespread adoption
zk-SNARKs Limitations:
Trusted setup requirement introduces potential security risks
Not quantum-resistant
Circuit-specific setup requirements
zk-STARKs Advantages:
No trusted setup required
Quantum-resistant security
Better scalability for large computations
Transparent and publicly verifiable
zk-STARKs Limitations:
Larger proof sizes result in higher verification costs
Newer technology with less widespread adoption
More complex implementation
Future Applications and Development
Zero-knowledge proofs and protocols are not magic, but they are an exciting frontier in blockchain technology. They have immense potential in a wide variety of applications where sensitive information is required, such as providing proof of password, proof of identity, and proof of membership.
Projects like Zcash and Aztec Protocol on Ethereum use ZKPs to enable private transactions, while StarkNet is advancing scalable, privacy-enhanced smart contract platforms using ZK-rollups. In the CBDC space, projects like Sweden's e-krona and the European Central Bank's digital euro have explored the theoretical use of ZKPs to balance privacy with regulatory compliance.
Challenges and Considerations
One of the most common classes of vulnerabilities in these systems is under-constrained logic, where insufficient constraints allow a malicious prover to produce a proof for an incorrect statement that still passes verification. A 2024 systematization of known attacks found that approximately 96% of documented circuit-layer bugs in SNARK-based systems were due to under-constrained circuits.
Conclusion
Zero-knowledge proofs represent a groundbreaking tool for redefining how we approach privacy, scalability, and trust in the digital realm. Their ability to prove knowledge or computational validity without leaking sensitive data opens up immense potential across blockchains, identity systems, enterprise solutions, and countless other domains. As this technology continues to mature, we can expect to see even more innovative applications that balance transparency with privacy, enabling a more secure and efficient digital future.
Top comments (0)