DEV Community

David Van Assche (S.L)
David Van Assche (S.L)

Posted on

The best (free - cheap) AI friendly Cli and Coding environments

#programming #ai #beginners #linux

With so many LLM providers and coding environments, how do you choose the right one for your next project? We all want the "best" model, but what we really need is the one that's the most reliable, the most cost-effective, and the most suited for our workflow. This guide breaks down the real-world performance, pricing, and hidden costs of the top LLM providers and CLI environments, from freemium to enterprise. We'll go beyond the marketing claims and give you the data you need to make an informed decision.

CLI and Code-Focused Environments (Sorted by Cost)

Tier 1: Free & Open-Source (Cost is just API Tokens / Free Tier Access)

  • Cursor CLI

    • Cost Model: Free. Relies on the user's API key (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.).
    • Use Case & Features: An editor and CLI environment built around a code-aware AI. Ideal for developers who want maximum control over the model and are happy to manage their own API costs.

  • Qwen Code

    • Cost Model: Free tier with 2,000 requests per day and a 60 RPM limit.
    • Use Case & Features: A coding agent focused on tool calling and environment interaction. Offers a generous free tier for developers on a budget, perfect for experimenting with agentic workflows.

  • GitHub Copilot CLI

    • Cost Model: Free Tier Available. New "Copilot Free" tier offers 2,000 code completions and 50 premium requests per month. Students, teachers, and open-source maintainers get Copilot Pro for free.
    • Use Case & Features: Agent-powered, GitHub-native tool that executes coding tasks. This is the new, more powerful agentic Copilot CLI, replacing the older gh-copilot extension.

Tier 2: Freemium & Free-for-Individual (Generous Free Access)

  • Gemini Code Assist

    • Cost Model: **Free for individuals (permanently).
    • ** Access to higher daily limits is available through a subscription to Google AI Pro ($19.99/month), which often includes an
    • extended free trial for 12 months for students in eligible regions.
    • Use Case & Features: An AI-first coding assistant integrated directly into major IDEs and the terminal (Gemini CLI). The individual version is a highly generous, no-cost option.

  • Warp Code

    • Cost Model: Freemium. Includes 150 free AI requests per month. Paid plans start around
    • $15/user/month for teams.
    • Use Case & Features: A complete agentic development environment that unifies the terminal, editor, and AI features. Known for its speed, local indexing, and multi-model orchestration.

  • Atlassian Rovodev

    • Cost Model: Free tier with an Atlassian Cloud account. Quotas are based on "AI credits" tied to paid Jira/Confluence plans.
    • Use Case & Features: Integrated with the Atlassian ecosystem, focusing on developer tasks within project management (Jira) and documentation (Confluence). Best for teams already on the Atlassian stack.

Tier 3: Subscription Required (Paid Access to High-End Models)

  • Codex CLI (OpenAI)

    • Cost Model: Included with ChatGPT paid plans (Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise), starting at $20/user/month (ChatGPT Plus).
    • Use Case & Features: A comprehensive software engineering agent powered by models like GPT-5-Codex. It works in the terminal, IDE, and cloud, using tools, tracking progress with a to-do list, and supporting multi-modal input.

  • Claude Code (Anthropic)

    • Cost Model: Likely included with a paid Claude Pro or higher subscription. Uses Anthropic's latest models (e.g., Sonnet/Opus).
    • Use Case & Features: An agentic coding partner focused on extended thinking and complex, multi-step tasks. It uses planning modes and creates project memory files (CLAUDE.md) for deep context management.

  • Grok CLI (xAI)

    • Cost Model: Requires an X Premium+ subscription, which is roughly $ 30 - $40/month for consumer access, or an API plan for token-based billing.
    • Use Case & Features: Distinguished by its focus on real-time data integration (from the X platform) and its "rebellious streak." Best for projects requiring up-to-the-minute data integration alongside coding tasks.

LLM and Inference Provider Cross-Reference

  • OpenAI

    • Freemium / Entry Level Cost: Free tier with a $5.00 credit (valid for 3 months).
    • Pricing Model: Pay-per-token; different rates for different models (e.g., GPT-4o is more expensive than GPT-3.5).
    • Reliability & Throughput: High. Offers tiered usage limits that scale with spend. Known for robust infrastructure but can have occasional downtime.

  • Anthropic

    • Freemium / Entry Level Cost: Free tier with a $10.00 credit (valid for a limited period).
    • Pricing Model: Pay-per-token. Haiku model is the most cost-effective.
    • Reliability & Throughput: High. Free tier has rate limits (e.g., 5 RPM, 20K TPM on Haiku), which are sufficient for development and experimentation.

  • Deepseek

    • Freemium / Entry Level Cost: Free tier with some trial credits.
    • Pricing Model: Pay-per-token, with separate rates for input (cache hit/miss) and output tokens.
    • Reliability & Throughput: Generally good, but may not have the same global infrastructure as larger providers. Good for cost-sensitive projects.

  • Qwen (Dashscope)

    • Freemium / Entry Level Cost: Free tier with 2,000 requests per day and a 60 RPM limit.
    • Pricing Model: Pay-per-token after free tier. The Qwen-Flash model is very cheap for simple tasks.
    • Reliability & Throughput: Good. The free tier is generous for personal projects and offers a great way to test the model's capabilities.

  • Fireworks AI

    • Freemium / Entry Level Cost: $50 monthly spend limit with a valid payment method.
    • Pricing Model: Pay-per-token. Very competitive rates for various open-source models like Deepseek and Qwen.
    • Reliability & Throughput: Very high. Known for its speed and low latency. The free tier is well-suited for experimentation and small-scale applications before committing to a higher spend tier.

  • Amazon Bedrock

    • Freemium / Entry Level Cost: Pay-as-you-go, no upfront cost. Some models have a free trial period.
    • Pricing Model: Complex. On-demand, provisioned throughput, and commitment-based pricing. Pricing varies significantly by model.
    • Reliability & Throughput: Extremely High. Backed by AWS's robust infrastructure, offering high reliability and the ability to scale. Best for production use cases where you need a consistent throughput.

  • Hugging Face

    • Freemium / Entry Level Cost: Free tier for inference endpoints on some models.
    • Pricing Model: Pay-per-hour for dedicated inference endpoints.
    • Reliability & Throughput: Reliability depends on the model's popularity and the infrastructure supporting it. The free tier can have high latency due to a queuing system.

  • OpenRouter

    • Freemium / Entry Level Cost: Pay-per-token. You only pay for what you use.
    • Pricing Model: Aggregator. Provides access to many models (including OpenAI and Anthropic) on a single API key, often at competitive rates.
    • Reliability & Throughput: Varies by model, but generally high. The platform manages the back-end complexity of multiple models, making it a great entry point for comparing different models.

Top comments (0)