No, it is a personal attack. It doesn't lead to constructive conversation. It leads to hate and pitchforks.
I'm not saying that we should tolerate climate change deniers or flat-earthers.
But I'm saying that personal attacks against them:
don't put you in a good light
don't show why they are wrong
increase the temperature of conversation and leads to emotional behavior instead of augmented conversation e.g. you use the same emotional tools that science deniers do. How is that better?
Instead, we should educate people. Show them how to rely on rational arguments, show them how their emotions can be employed to trick them in wrong decisions, show what fallacies are, talk about biases.
Why do quacks exist? Because of lack of education, lack of critical thinking, because quacks use our emotional nature.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
No, it is a personal attack. It doesn't lead to constructive conversation. It leads to hate and pitchforks.
I'm not saying that we should tolerate climate change deniers or flat-earthers.
But I'm saying that personal attacks against them:
Instead, we should educate people. Show them how to rely on rational arguments, show them how their emotions can be employed to trick them in wrong decisions, show what fallacies are, talk about biases.
Why do quacks exist? Because of lack of education, lack of critical thinking, because quacks use our emotional nature.