That react post is an example of pure negativity. If we go around and look at everything negative in life we'll have a 30,000 page book. If you personally think something isn't worth using, then don't use it. Saying is made by those people is heavily biased, and not really a fact. The slow point was really the only fact in that post.
I agree although I try not to respond to negativity with negativity.
Like you said he has a valid point about performance but what bothered me is that there were no alternatives, improvements, or constructive feedback in the post.
Yes, React comes with costs but what do you gain from it? That is the question I try to answer here and really only scraped the surface responding to the opposing post.
That react post is an example of pure negativity. If we go around and look at everything negative in life we'll have a 30,000 page book. If you personally think something isn't worth using, then don't use it. Saying is made by those people is heavily biased, and not really a fact. The slow point was really the only fact in that post.
I agree although I try not to respond to negativity with negativity.
Like you said he has a valid point about performance but what bothered me is that there were no alternatives, improvements, or constructive feedback in the post.
Yes, React comes with costs but what do you gain from it? That is the question I try to answer here and really only scraped the surface responding to the opposing post.
Totally agree with you.