DEV Community

Cover image for Did you know that Oracle owns the trademark to Javascript?
Nick Karnik
Nick Karnik

Posted on

Did you know that Oracle owns the trademark to Javascript?

I have used Javascript for over 20 years, but I was unaware that Oracle owned the trademark to Javascript. If anything, I would have guessed that Mozilla owned it.

Oracle inherited the trademark after they bought Sun Microsystems (I didn't even know Sun had trademarked Javascript!).

I came across a Reddit post where Apple took down an App because the AppStore displayed the word JAVASCRIPT without authorization from Oracle.

I wonder if they will continue to enforce it in the future given that it is such a ubiquitous term. Many have suggested that we should refer to it as ES going forward and call it a day. I'm not sure how I feel about that.

Did you know about this? What are your thoughts?


Latest comments (32)

Collapse
 
sunnyujjawal profile image
Sunny Kr

No, that statement is not accurate. Oracle does not own the trademark to JavaScript. JavaScript, originally developed by Netscape, is a scripting language that is now standardized by the Ecma International organization under the name ECMAScript. The trademark for JavaScript is held by Oracle's subsidiary, Oracle America Inc., due to their acquisition of Sun Microsystems, which previously owned the trademark. However, it's important to note that JavaScript as a programming language is an open standard and widely used across different platforms and implementations.

Collapse
 
fluentmoheshwar profile image
Moheshwar Amarnath Biswas

I found it right now from ecma-international.org/technical-c...

Collapse
 
cmelgarejo profile image
Christian Melgarejo

What about "JayScript" with Jay as in crow? That can be a good way to preserve the file extensions, coloquial naming of "Jay-S" and have a cool logo with a badass bird.

Collapse
 
tetranyble profile image
Tetranyble

Trust me I've never considered this neither asked questions regarding the trademark of JavaScript. Now I know

Collapse
 
andreandyp profile image
AndrΓ© Michel Andy

Yes, I knew it. That's why I would have liked "LiveScript" instead of "JavaScript", it would be less confusing and more attractive.

Collapse
 
sadarshannaiynar profile image
Adarsh

Well now I am just afraid Oracle might do something similar to JavaScript like they did for Java with Java 11.

Collapse
 
stereobooster profile image
stereobooster

They can't do anything with it. They own trademark, but do not drive its development. Development is done by TC39 committee (for ECMA org I guess)

Collapse
 
simov profile image
simo

Just rename it to [SomethingElse]Script already!

JavaScript is no good for obvious reasons.

ECMAScript is kind of weird.

LiveScript is cool but it's already taken. BTW that was the intended name before Sun intervened.

NeatScript sounds good too :)

Collapse
 
brianemilius profile image
Brian Emilius

Scripty McScriptface
I'd vote for that

Collapse
 
stereobooster profile image
stereobooster

Well, the story is: in early days there were browser wars, it was Netscape (current Mozilla) against internet explorer. Microsoft was a big player and Netscape joined forces with Sun to fight with IE, they renamed their new programing language LiveScript to JavaScript and made it trademark (because Sun already owned Java) so that Microsoft could not copy it (narrator voice: Microsoft copied). Microsoft created another language which is named JScript. Later they gave up this fight and joined forces as ECMAScript, which is the official name of JS right now.

(Disclaimer: I didn't do any fact check, this is from my head as I remember it).

Collapse
 
adam_cyclones profile image
Adam Crockett πŸŒ€

JavaScript not Javascript if I do say so myself.

Collapse
 
eljayadobe profile image
Eljay-Adobe

JavaScript was originally called LiveScript, and was developed under the codename Mocha.

Try to call JavaScript something else is probably too late.

EcmaScript, ActionScript, ExtendScript, LiveScript, Mocha... alas, that ship has sailed.

We can only blame marketing folks for the rebranding, and trying to ride the coattails of Java's popularity at that time.