Nice! you can use allSetteled instead of .all() which will not throw one error occouring. Personally I prefer the classic for loop. more readable.
Hi @tomerl101 , thanks for suggesting it. One of my collegue also suggested it after reading this post, and then I wrote this article explaining Promise methods
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Nice! you can use allSetteled instead of .all() which will not throw one error occouring.
Personally I prefer the classic for loop. more readable.
Hi @tomerl101 , thanks for suggesting it. One of my collegue also suggested it after reading this post, and then I wrote this article explaining Promise methods
Deal with Promises like a Pro 😎
Anshuman Bhardwaj ・ Jan 10 ・ 6 min read