DEV Community

Cover image for From Messy HTML to AI-Ready News Apps with Firecrawl + Lovable

From Messy HTML to AI-Ready News Apps with Firecrawl + Lovable

In the era of "Agentic" workflows, the biggest bottleneck isn't the LLM—it’s the data. Most websites are a mess of HTML, ads, and pop-ups that choke standard scrapers.

Firecrawl introduced a native integration with Lovable. The idea is simple but powerful: Firecrawl handles the hard problem of turning the web into clean, LLM-ready data, while Lovable handles everything else—UI, app logic, and deployment.
With this integration, Lovable users can connect directly to Firecrawl’s APIs and build web-data-powered applications without writing traditional scraping code.

I explored what this unlocks in practice. I built Pulse Reader: a modern AI news aggregator that transforms any messy news URL into clean, structured, AI-ready summaries.

Here is the technical breakdown of how I built it using Firecrawl for data ingestion and Lovable for rapid full-stack development.


Traditional web scraping with tools like Puppeteer or BeautifulSoup requires constant maintenance. If a news site changes its CSS classes, your scraper breaks. Furthermore, feeding raw HTML into an LLM is expensive and noisy.

A robust solution must:

  1. Render JavaScript automatically.
  2. Strip layout noise, such as ads and navigation
  3. Convert content into clean Markdown.
  4. Could be integrated into a frontend in minutes.

The Stack

  • Ingestion: Firecrawl (specifically the /scrape and /extract features).
  • Frontend/App Logic: Lovable (an AI full-stack engineer tool).
  • Styling: Tailwind CSS with a Glassmorphism aesthetic.

Configuring the Firecrawl "Engine"

The ingestion layer begins with Firecrawl. An API key provides access to a managed extraction pipeline that replaces custom scrapers entirely.

 A screenshot of Firecrawl API dashboard

Firecrawl’s power lies in its simplicity. Instead of writing complex selectors, You can simply tell the API you want the output in Markdown format. This ensures that no matter how messy the source site is, your app receives a clean, standardized string.


"Vibe-Coding" the UI with Lovable

With web data standardized, Lovable handles application generation. Using natural-language instructions, Lovable produces:

  • The application interface
  • Data flow wiring
  • Firecrawl API integration
  • Deployment-ready output

A screenshot of the


The Data Flow

When a user pastes a URL (like TechCrunch) into Pulse Reader, the following happens:
Request: The frontend sends the URL to Firecrawl.
Extraction: Firecrawl bypasses anti-bot headers, renders the JavaScript, and strips away the "noise" (ads/sidebars).
Transformation: The clean Markdown is returned to the app.
UI Render: Pulse Reader takes that Markdown and displays it in beautiful, readable cards.

Pulse Reader

Over-Delivering with "Copy Markdown"

To support downstream AI workflows, Pulse Reader exposes Copy Markdown and Download Feed actions. This allows extracted content to be reused directly in tools like ChatGPT or Claude without additional cleaning or transformation.

This design ensures that Firecrawl’s output is not only readable but immediately reusable across research, summarization, and agent workflows.


In conclusion

Building Pulse Reader proved that the barrier to building sophisticated data tools has vanished.

  • Firecrawl is the "clean pipe" for web data. It provides a stable, production-grade ingestion layer for live web data.
  • Lovable is the high-speed engine for building the interface. It compresses application development into a prompt-driven workflow

Still a work in progress 👉 Check out the Live Demo here


Top comments (1)

Collapse
 
onlineproxyio profile image
OnlineProxy

Firecrawl straight-up just worked on sites that used to clown our DIY stack-Forbes articles, Guardian live blogs, CNBC features-spitting clean Markdown with stable headings, images, and quotes, while Lovable’s vibe-coding covered 80-90% of the UI. Swapping HTML-Markdown shaved tokens by 45-70%, latency by 25-40%, and cost by 35-60%. On heavy JS and infinite scroll, time-boxed scrolling plus content-hash idle detection and depth caps bumped full-capture success from ~72% to ~96%. “Copy Markdown” plugs into RAG and actually moves the needle: accuracy up 7-12%, cost down 40-55%, latency down 25-35%, thanks to semantic chunking and frontmatter provenance. Ops-wise, we hit /scrape first, fall back to /extract, key idempotency to the canonical-URL hash, dedupe with SimHash and keep costs chill with CDN + ETag revalidation plus content-hash and vector caches.