DEV Community

Vipul Kumar
Vipul Kumar

Posted on

Understanding the Saga Pattern in Microservices

πŸ”„ Definition β€” The Saga pattern is a design pattern used to manage distributed transactions in microservices by breaking them into a series of smaller, local transactions.

🧩 Components β€” Each local transaction updates the database and triggers the next transaction through events or messages.

βš™οΈ Coordination β€” Sagas can be coordinated using either choreography, where each service listens for events, or orchestration, where a central coordinator manages the process.

πŸ”„ Compensating Transactions β€” If a transaction step fails, compensating transactions are executed to undo the changes made by previous steps.

πŸ“ˆ Use Case β€” The Saga pattern is particularly useful in systems where traditional ACID transactions are not feasible due to the distributed nature of microservices.

Saga Pattern Approaches

πŸ”„ Choreography β€” In this approach, each service involved in the saga listens for events and performs its transaction when triggered by an event. This method is decentralized and allows services to operate independently.

🎯 Orchestration β€” This approach uses a central coordinator to manage the sequence of transactions. The orchestrator directs each service on what action to take and when, providing a more controlled flow.

πŸ”” Event-Driven β€” Choreography relies heavily on an event-driven architecture, where services communicate through events, often using message brokers.

πŸ•ΉοΈ Central Control β€” Orchestration provides a single point of control, which can simplify error handling and compensating transactions.

πŸ”„ Flexibility β€” Choreography offers more flexibility and resilience to changes, as services are loosely coupled and can evolve independently.

Advantages and Disadvantages

πŸ‘ Advantages β€” The Saga pattern allows for distributed transaction management without the need for a central transaction manager, improving system resilience and scalability.

πŸ”„ Non-Blocking β€” Unlike 2PC, the Saga pattern does not block resources, allowing for better performance and availability.

πŸ”„ Fault Tolerance β€” Sagas can handle failures gracefully by executing compensating transactions, maintaining data consistency.

πŸ‘Ž Disadvantages β€” Implementing compensating transactions can be complex, and ensuring eventual consistency requires careful design.

πŸ”„ Complexity β€” The pattern can introduce complexity in terms of managing the sequence of transactions and handling failures.

Real-World Examples

πŸ›’ E-commerce β€” In an e-commerce application, the Saga pattern can manage order processing, payment, inventory updates, and shipping as separate transactions.

🏦 Banking β€” Financial applications use sagas to handle transactions like money transfers, where each step (debit, credit) is a separate transaction.

🚚 Logistics β€” In logistics, sagas manage the sequence of operations like order placement, inventory check, and delivery scheduling.

🎟️ Ticketing β€” Ticket booking systems use sagas to handle seat reservation, payment processing, and ticket issuance.

πŸ₯ Healthcare β€” In healthcare systems, sagas manage patient data updates across different services like appointment scheduling, billing, and medical records.

Read On LinkedIn or WhatsApp

Follow me on: LinkedIn | WhatsApp | Medium | Dev.to | Github

Top comments (0)